How White nationalists mobilize genetics: From genetic ancestry and human biodiversity to counterscience and metapolitics
2020/09/28 by Aaron Panofsky, Kushan Dasgupta, Nicole Iturriaga · 33 citations
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology · #Race, Genetics, and Society #BRCA gene mutations in cancer #Metabolism and Genetic Disorders
paper · doi:10.1002/ajpa.24150
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Our aim in this study was to understand how genetics ideas are appropriated and mobilized online toward the political projects of White nationalism and the alt right. Studying three different online venues, we investigated how genetics is used to support racial realism, hereditarianism, and racial hierarchy. We analyzed how these ideas are connected to political and metapolitical projects. In addition, we examined the strategies used to build authority for these interpretations. METHODS: We analyze three online venues in which genetics has been mobilized to advance racial realism and hereditarian explanations of racial differences. These were (a) the use of genetic ancestry tests in online nationalist discussions, (b) blogs and other venues in which the human biodiversity ideas are articulated, (c) activities surrounding the OpenPsych collection of online journals. Ethnographic and interpretive methods were applied to investigate scientific and political meanings of efforts to mobilize genetic ideas. RESULTS: We found that White nationalists use genetic ancestry tests to align White identity with ideas of racial purity and diversity, educating each other about genetics, and debating the boundaries of Whiteness. "Human biodiversity" has been mobilized as a movement to catalog and create hereditarian ideas about racial differences and to distribute them as "red pills" to transform online discourse. The OpenPsych journals have allowed amateur hereditarian psychologists to publish papers, coordinate activity, and legitimate their project at the academic margins. CONCLUSIONS: These various appropriations of genetics aim to further racial realism and hereditarian explanations of racial social and behavioral differences. Beyond these substantive aims, on a "metapolitical" level, they serve to reframe concepts and standards for political and scientific discussion of race, challenge structures of academic legitimacy and expertise, and build a cadre of ideological foot soldiers armed with an argumentative toolkit. As professional anthropologists and geneticists aim to accurately communicate their science and its implications for understanding human differences to the public, they must contend with these substantive claims and metapolitical contexts.
Cited by
- Power and Limitations of Inferring Genetic Ancestry
- Primate Behavior and the Importance of Comparative Studies in Biological Anthropology
- Half a century later and we're back where we started: How the problem of locality turned in to the problem of portability
- Sharing Knowledge Openly: Author Gender, Race/Ethnicity, and Feminist Science
- Genetic Essentialism Among Supporters of Populist Radical-Right Parties: Evidence From Sweden and Norway
- Can Open Science Advance Health Justice? Genomic Research Dissemination in the Evolving Data‐Sharing Landscape
- ‘In Our Blood’: Archaeology and ‘Indigeneity’ in the British National Party’s Magazine Identity
- Unintended social effects of newborn genomic data use and storage in the age of sociogenomics and genetic surveillance
- The fringe is the centre: Racism, pseudoscience and authoritarianism in the dominant English education policy network
- Wrestling with Social and Behavioral Genomics: Risks, Potential Benefits, and Ethical Responsibility
- Confronting the “Weaponization” of Genetics by Racists Online and Elsewhere
- Intelligence quotient [wikipedia]
- FoGS provides a public FAQ repository for social and behavioral genomic discoveries. [europepmc]
- Half a century later and we're back where we started: How the problem of locality turned in to the problem of portability. [europepmc]
- Recommendations for Sustainable Ancient DNA Research in the Global South: Voices From a New Generation of Paleogenomicists. [europepmc]
- Thinking Structurally: A Cognitive Framework for Understanding How People Attribute Inequality to Structural Causes. [europepmc]
- Developmental behavioral genetics research on school achievement is missing vulnerable children, to our detriment. [europepmc]
- Data sharing and community-engaged research. [europepmc]
- Wrestling with Social and Behavioral Genomics: Risks, Potential Benefits, and Ethical Responsibility. [europepmc]
- Toward an evolutionary ecology of (in)equality. [europepmc]
- Considerations, Caveats, and Suggestions for the Use of Polygenic Scores for Social and Behavioral Traits. [europepmc]
- 'Dysgenic fertility' is an ideological, not a scientific, concept. A Comment on: 'Stability and change in male fertility patterns by cognitive ability across 32 birth cohorts' (2023), by Bratsberg & Rogeberg. [europepmc]
- Typological thinking in human genomics research contributes to the production and prominence of scientific racism. [europepmc]
- Race science without racists: how bigoted paradigms persist in allergy research. [europepmc]
- The clinical, mechanistic, and social impacts of air pollution on atopic dermatitis. [europepmc]
- The Geneticization of Education and Its Bioethical Implications. [europepmc]
- Confronting the "Weaponization" of Genetics by Racists Online and Elsewhere. [europepmc]
- Can Open Science Advance Health Justice? Genomic Research Dissemination in the Evolving Data-Sharing Landscape. [europepmc]
- How to Diagnose Abhorrent Science. [europepmc]
- Navigating sexual orientation and gender identity data privacy concerns in United States genetics practices. [europepmc]
- Social and Behavioral Genomics: On the Ethics of the Research and Its Downstream Applications. [europepmc]
- The Legal Uncertainties of Sociogenomic Polygenic Scores. [europepmc]
- Principles and Policy Recommendations for Comprehensive Genetic Data Governance. [europepmc]
Related