Comparative efficacy and cost of the prostaglandin analogs dinoprostone and misoprostol as labor preinduction agents

2003/02/01 by Patrick S. Ramsey, Denise Y. Harris, Paul L. Ogburn +3 · 8 citations
Medicine · #Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions #Maternal and fetal healthcare #Reproductive Health and Contraception

paper · doi:10.1067/mob.2003.150

Cited by

• Intracervical prostaglandins for induction of labour. [europepmc]
• Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour. [europepmc]
• Prostaglandin E2 labour induction with intravaginal (Minprostin) versus intracervical (Prepidil) administration at term: randomized study of maternal and neonatal outcome and patient's perception using the osgood semantic differential scales. [europepmc]
• Reduction in resource use with the misoprostol vaginal insert vs the dinoprostone vaginal insert for labour induction: a model-based analysis from a United Kingdom healthcare perspective. [europepmc]
• Reporting and Analysis of Trial-Based Cost-Effectiveness Evaluations in Obstetrics and Gynaecology. [europepmc]
• Discovery and Optimization of 7-Alkylidenyltetrahydroindazole-Based Acylsulfonamide EP3 Antagonists. [europepmc]
• Safety and efficacy of double-balloon catheter for cervical ripening: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. [europepmc]
• Comparing labour induction outcomes using misoprostol and dinoprostone in term pregnancies: A retrospective study at Kiambu Level 5 Hospital between 2018 and 2020. [europepmc]