vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

Learning in Infinitesimal Non-Compositional Sketches

2026/07/16 by Sridhar Mahadevan
#cs.LG #math.CT

paper · pdf

Abstract

This paper develops a categorical framework -- Learning in Infinitesimal Non-Compositional Sketches (LINCS) -- as the repair of non-compositionality: failures of diagrams to factor through quotient sketches lifted to the tangent category setting. Machine learning problems are specified as sketches: graphs with commutativity conditions \mathcal D, limit cones \mathcal L, and colimit cocones \mathcal K, generalizing the usual scalarization of loss functions or vector space assumptions. Non-compositionality is defined purely as failure of a universal factorization problem, not as arithmetic error between the desired and actual predictions. Given a learning sketch \mathbb S=(S,\mathcal D,\mathcal L,\mathcal K), whose underlying graph is S, and a model D:J → C, the base defect is the obstruction to factorization Obs(Fact\mathbb S(D)). The tangent lift applies the tangent functor T to obtain TD:J → C, and LINCS is defined as the obstruction Obs(Fact\mathbb S(TD)) -- asking whether infinitesimal perturbations preserve the compositionality constraints.The paper also introduces Tangent Learning Sketches, which are sketches equipped with Cockett-Cruttwell tangent structure. The paper defines the INC endofunctor, which iterates the tangent lift, producing a tower D,TD,T2D, ⋯ of factorization problems. ML is thereby formulated as the search for a coalgebraic fixed point where successive tangent unfoldings stabilize (νTINC). Using the Aczel--Mendler theorem, we prove existence of a final INC coalgebra whenever TINC admits a set-based class realization that creates its final carrier. A detailed experimental evaluation of LINCS is underway in a number of concrete ML settings, including deep learning, large language models, and reinforcement learning, and is described in companion papers.

Related