vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

An Evaluation of Impacts in "Nanoscience & nanotechnology:" Steps towards standards for citation analysis

2011/09/11 by Loet Leydesdorff, Leydesdorff, Loet
Computer Science · Decision Sciences · #cs.DL #scientometrics and bibliometrics research

paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1109.2306

Scientometrics (in press). Paper to be presented at the 2011 Atlanta Conference on Science, Technology, and Innovation Policy, September 15-17, Atlanta GA

arxiv created 2012/04/07 · arxiv updated 2012/04/10

Abstract

One is inclined to conceptualize impact in terms of citations per publication, and thus as an average. However, citation distributions are skewed, and the average has the disadvantage that the number of publications is used in the denominator. Using hundred percentiles, one can integrate the normalized citation curve and develop an indicator that can be compared across document sets because percentile ranks are defined at the article level. I apply this indicator to the set of 58 journals in the ISI Subject Category of "Nanoscience & nanotechnology," and rank journals, countries, cities, and institutes using non-parametric statistics. The significance levels of results can thus be indicated. The results are first compared with the ISI-Impact Factors, but this Integrated Impact Indicator (I3) can be used with any set downloaded from the (Social) Science Citation Index. The software is made publicly available at the Internet. Visualization techniques are also specified for evaluation by positioning institutes on Google Map overlays.

Related