vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

Controversy between Einstein and Bohr and two erroneous arguments used in supporting Copenhagen quantum mechanics

2006/01/03 by M. V. Lokajíček, Lokajicek, Milos V.
Computer Science · Medicine · Physics and Astronomy · #Biofield Effects and Biophysics #FOS: Physical sciences #Quantum Information and Cryptography #Quantum Mechanics and Applications #Quantum Physics (quant-ph)

paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/0601015

openalex publication_date 2006/01/03 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28

Abstract

The support of Copenhagen quantum mechanics in the discussion concerning EPR experiments has been based fundamentally on two mistakes. First, quantum mechanics as well as hidden-variable theory give the same predictions; the statement of Belinfante from 1973 about the significant difference must be denoted as mistake. Secondly, the experimental violation of Bell's inequalities has been erroneously interpreted as excluding the hidden-variable alternative, while they have been based on assumption corresponding to classical physics. The EPR experiments cannot bring, therefore, any decision in the controversy between Einstein and Bohr. However, the view of Einstein is strongly supported by experimental results concerning the light transmission through three polarizers.

Citations

Related