vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

Can Large Language Models Grasp Legal Theories? Enhance Legal Reasoning with Insights from Multi-Agent Collaboration

2024/10/03 by Weikang Yuan, Junjie Cao, Yuan, Weikang +17 · 3 citations
Computer Science · Social Sciences · #Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) #Artificial Intelligence in Law #Comparative and International Law Studies #Computation and Language (cs.CL) #FOS: Computer and information sciences #I.2.7 #Law, AI, and Intellectual Property

paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.02507

openalex publication_date 2024/10/03 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28

Abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) could struggle to fully understand legal theories and perform complex legal reasoning tasks. In this study, we introduce a challenging task (confusing charge prediction) to better evaluate LLMs' understanding of legal theories and reasoning capabilities. We also propose a novel framework: Multi-Agent framework for improving complex Legal Reasoning capability (MALR). MALR employs non-parametric learning, encouraging LLMs to automatically decompose complex legal tasks and mimic human learning process to extract insights from legal rules, helping LLMs better understand legal theories and enhance their legal reasoning abilities. Extensive experiments on multiple real-world datasets demonstrate that the proposed framework effectively addresses complex reasoning issues in practical scenarios, paving the way for more reliable applications in the legal domain.

Cited by

Related