2015/10/20 by Daniela Furrer, François Sanschagrin, Simon Jacob +1 · 90 citations
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology · Medicine · #Advanced Biosensing Techniques and Applications #Breast Cancer Treatment Studies #Breast cancer #Cancer #Computer science #HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research #Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 #Internal medicine #Lapatinib #Medical physics #Medicine #Oncology #Standardization #Trastuzumab
paper · pdf · doi:10.1309/ajcpt41tcbuevdqc
published in American Journal of Clinical Pathology 144(5), 686-703 (Oxford University Press)
openalex publication_date 2015/10/20 · openalex created_date 2016/06/24 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/05
OBJECTIVES: Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) plays a central role as a prognostic and predictive marker in breast cancer specimens. Reliable HER2 evaluation is central to determine the eligibility of patients with breast cancer to targeted anti-HER2 therapies such as trastuzumab and lapatinib. Presently, several methods exist for the determination of HER2 status at different levels (protein, RNA, and DNA level). METHODS: In this review, we discuss the main advantages and disadvantages of the techniques developed so far for the evaluation of HER2 status in breast cancer specimens. RESULTS: Each technique has its own advantages and disadvantages. It is therefore not surprising that no consensus has been reached so far on which technique is the best for the determination of HER2 status. CONCLUSIONS: Currently, emphasis must be put on standardization of procedures, internal and external quality control assessment, and competency evaluation of already existing methods to ensure accurate, reliable, and clinically meaningful test results. Development of new robust and accurate diagnostic assays should also be encouraged. In addition, large clinical trials are warranted to identify the technique that most reliably predicts a positive response to anti-HER2 drugs.