“Expanding the Moral Community” or “Blaming the Victim”? The Politics of State Education Accountability Policy

2007/03/01 by Kathryn A. McDermott
Social Sciences · Decision Sciences · #Public Policy and Administration Research #Policy Transfer and Learning #Evaluation and Performance Assessment

paper · doi:10.3102/0002831206299010

Abstract

Advocates of educational accountability policies say that the policies are intended to use the state’s authority to ensure equal educational opportunity. Opponents make essentially the opposite claim: that expanded state power is intended to disempower local communities and to single them out for blame, in response to larger political and economic imperatives. This article analyzes the enactment of educational accountability policies in four U.S. states, drawing upon legislative documents, hearing and debate transcripts where available, and press coverage. The analysis concludes that policy makers did intend to make the public education system more equitable. However, the results of the policies as implemented show a significant gap between aspirations and results. This gap increases the accountability-policy critics’ credibility.

Related

• A narrative policy framework analysis of Arizona’s Empowerment Scholarship Accounts
• The No Child Left Behind Act in the Global Architecture of Educational Accountability
• School Accountability, Long-Run Criminal Activity, and Self-Sufficiency*
• The Vital Necessity of Critical Education Policy Research
• Policy Dialogue: Twenty Years of Test-Based Accountability