vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

Remarks on pointed digital homotopy

2015/03/10 by Laurence Boxer, Boxer, Laurence, P. Christopher Staecker +1
Computer Science · Mathematics · #55P10 #68R10 #Combinatorics (math.CO) #Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV) #FOS: Computer and information sciences #FOS: Mathematics #General Topology (math.GN) #I.4.m #acm:55P10 #acm:68R10 #cs.CV #math.CO #math.GN #msc:55P10 #msc:68R10

paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1503.03016

major new section, some errors corrected

arxiv created 2015/06/04 · arxiv updated 2015/06/05

Abstract

We present and explore in detail a pair of digital images with cu-adjacencies that are homotopic but not pointed homotopic. For two digital loops f,g: [0,m]Z → X with the same basepoint, we introduce the notion of \em tight at the basepoint (TAB) pointed homotopy, which is more restrictive than ordinary pointed homotopy and yields some different results. We present a variant form of the digital fundamental group. Based on what we call \em eventually constant loops, this version of the fundamental group is equivalent to that of Boxer (1999), but offers the advantage that eventually constant maps are often easier to work with than the trivial extensions that are key to the development of the fundamental group in Boxer (1999) and many subsequent papers. We show that homotopy equivalent digital images have isomorphic fundamental groups, even when the homotopy equivalence does not preserve the basepoint. This assertion appeared in Boxer (2005), but there was an error in the proof; here, we correct the error.

Related