2022/08/30 by Tommaso Denti, Massimo Marinacci, Mássimo Marinacci +1 · 36 citations
Decision Sciences · Mathematics · Social Sciences · #Computer science #Core (optical fiber) #Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics #Distribution (mathematics) #Econometrics #Economics #Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies #Game Theory and Applications #Mathematical economics #Mathematics
paper · doi:10.1257/aer.20210879
published in American Economic Review 112(9), 3106-3123 (American Economic Association)
openalex publication_date 2022/08/30 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/30
We relate two main representations of the cost of acquiring information: a cost that depends on the experiment performed, as in statistical decision theory, and a cost that depends on the distribution of posterior beliefs, as in applications of rational inattention. We show that in many cases of interest, posterior-based costs are inconsistent with a primitive model of costly experimentation. The inconsistency is at the core of known limits to the application of rational inattention in games and, more broadly, in equilibrium analyses where beliefs are endogenous; we show that an experiment-based approach helps to understand and overcome these difficulties. (JEL D82, D83)