2014/02/09 by Yuchen Zhang, Martin J. Wainwright, Zhang, Yuchen +3 · 5 citations
Computer Science · Engineering · #Blind Source Separation Techniques #Computational Complexity (cs.CC) #FOS: Computer and information sciences #FOS: Mathematics #Machine Learning and Algorithms #Sparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques #Statistics Theory (math.ST) #Stochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques
paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1402.1918
openalex publication_date 2014/02/09 · openalex created_date 2019/06/27 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28
Under a standard assumption in complexity theory (NP not in P/poly), we\ndemonstrate a gap between the minimax prediction risk for sparse linear\nregression that can be achieved by polynomial-time algorithms, and that\nachieved by optimal algorithms. In particular, when the design matrix is\nill-conditioned, the minimax prediction loss achievable by polynomial-time\nalgorithms can be substantially greater than that of an optimal algorithm. This\nresult is the first known gap between polynomial and optimal algorithms for\nsparse linear regression, and does not depend on conjectures in average-case\ncomplexity.\n