2013/12/18 by Niels Bache, Bache, Niels
Computer Science · Engineering · Mathematics · #Applications (stat.AP) #FOS: Computer and information sciences #Maritime Navigation and Safety #Ship Hydrodynamics and Maneuverability #Target Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks #stat.AP
paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1312.5224
Key words: Active sensor. Sonar. Radar. Lidar. Evasive target. Detection. Missed opportunities. Detection width. Forestalling. Counter detection
arxiv created 2013/12/18 · openalex publication_date 2013/12/18 · arxiv updated 2013/12/19 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28
Your task is to detect a submarine with your active sonar. The submarine can hear your active sonar before you can detect him. If the submarine is fast enough he can evade you before you can detect him. How do you then detect him? If you are using your active sonar continuously you will not detect him. Likewise, if you are not using your sonar at all. In between those two extremes there is an optimum. We will find that optimum. Or said more precisely and general: In the same two dimensional region two platforms are present. One platform, the searcher, equipped with one active sensor (sonar, radar, lidar etc.), is trying to detect the other platform, the target, by means of its active sensor. The target tries to avoid detection using only a passive sensor to detect the searcher. The target can detect the active sensor before the searcher can detect the target (forestalling). The active sensor is therefore used intermittently to surprise the target. The aim of this study is to quantify the passive period of the active sensor by minimizing missed detection opportunities. The active period is subsequently found by maximizing the average detection width of the searcher sensor over time.