2021/06/14 by Daniel LeJeune, Hamid Javadi, LeJeune, Daniel +3
Computer Science · Engineering · #Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning #FOS: Computer and information sciences #Machine Learning (cs.LG) #Machine Learning (stat.ML) #Machine Learning and ELM #Sparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques #Stochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques
paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2106.07769
openalex publication_date 2021/06/14 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28
Among the most successful methods for sparsifying deep (neural) networks are\nthose that adaptively mask the network weights throughout training. By\nexamining this masking, or dropout, in the linear case, we uncover a duality\nbetween such adaptive methods and regularization through the so-called\n"\η-trick" that casts both as iteratively reweighted optimizations. We show\nthat any dropout strategy that adapts to the weights in a monotonic way\ncorresponds to an effective subquadratic regularization penalty, and therefore\nleads to sparse solutions. We obtain the effective penalties for several\npopular sparsification strategies, which are remarkably similar to classical\npenalties commonly used in sparse optimization. Considering variational dropout\nas a case study, we demonstrate similar empirical behavior between the adaptive\ndropout method and classical methods on the task of deep network\nsparsification, validating our theory.\n