vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

Guess your neighbour's input: no quantum advantage but an advantage for quantum theory

2012/05/14 by Antonio Acín, Mafalda L. Almeida, Acín, Antonio +5 · 1 citation
Computer Science · Physics and Astronomy · #FOS: Physical sciences #Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture #Quantum Information and Cryptography #Quantum Mechanics and Applications #Quantum Physics (quant-ph) #quant-ph

paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1205.3076

31 pages; a chapter submitted for the book "Quantum Theory: Informational Foundations and Foils"

arxiv created 2012/05/14 · openalex publication_date 2012/05/14 · arxiv updated 2012/05/15 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28

Abstract

Quantum mechanics dramatically differs from classical physics, allowing for a wide range of genuinely quantum phenomena. The goal of quantum information is to understand information processing from a quantum perspective. In this mindset, it is thus natural to focus on tasks where quantum resources provide an advantage over classical ones, and to overlook tasks where quantum mechanics provides no advantage. But are the latter tasks really useless from a more general perspective? Here we discuss a simple information-theoretic game called 'guess your neighbour's input', for which classical and quantum players perform equally well. We will see that this seemingly innocuous game turns out to be useful in various contexts. From a fundamental point of view, the game provides a sharp separation between quantum mechanics and other more general physical theories, hence bringing a deeper understanding of the foundations of quantum mechanics. The game also finds unexpected applications in quantum foundations and quantum information theory, related to Gleason's theorem, and to bound entanglement and unextendible product bases.

Cited by

Related