vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

Developmental Atlas of Attention Head Specialization: Spacing, Stranding, and the Capacity Tax of BPE Tokenization

2025/11/21 by Tatsuya Aoyama, Ethan Gotlieb Wilcox, Aoyama, Tatsuya +3 · 1 citation
Social Sciences · Computer Science · #Language and cultural evolution #Topic Modeling #Natural Language Processing Techniques

paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2511.16893

Abstract

Approximately half of all attention heads in standard BPE models are consumed by mandatory whitespace boundary recovery. Removing these heads degrades performance by +64%, proving the recovery is essential, but merge barriers (a 16-line tokenizer configuration change) eliminate the need for it entirely. An additional 8% of heads collapse into position-zero sinks that contribute nothing (confirmed by ablation: +1.4% change when removed). Together, over half of attention capacity in standard BPE is non-productive. We establish these findings through a developmental atlas: the first comprehensive tracking of attention head specialization at realistic scale, covering 384 headsacross 7 behavior types, 131 checkpoints per run, and six training runs on two corpora (GPT-NeoX 410M). Key results: (1) spacing is a fixed capacity tax of ~45% of heads regardless of corpus composition, confirmed by a falsified prediction on a mixed corpus (2) P0 sinking is a failure cascade at 8.3%, with the first causal proof that P0 heads contribute nothing (3) BPE damage operates in two regimes (spacing on web text, stranding on structured data) that form a continuum (4) merge barriers are universal across character sets. Third paper in a research program on tokenizer-attention coupling (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20925910) and stranded attention (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21158886).

Citations

Cited by

Related