vix.ing · top · new · best · stats

Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Features

2019/05/06 by Andrew Ilyas, Ilyas, Andrew, Shibani Santurkar +10 · 6 voices · 395 citations
Computer Science · Mathematics · #Advanced Malware Detection Techniques #Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning #Adversarial system #Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications #Artificial intelligence #Computer science #Data science #Epistemology #Machine learning #Robustness (evolution) #Simple (philosophy) #Theoretical computer science #cs.CR #cs.CV #cs.LG #stat.ML

paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1905.02175

published in arXiv (Cornell University) 32, 125-136 (Cornell University)

openalex publication_date 2019/05/06 · arxiv created 2019/08/12 · arxiv updated 2019/08/13 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28

Abstract

Adversarial examples have attracted significant attention in machine learning, but the reasons for their existence and pervasiveness remain unclear. We demonstrate that adversarial examples can be directly attributed to the presence of non-robust features: features derived from patterns in the data distribution that are highly predictive, yet brittle and incomprehensible to humans. After capturing these features within a theoretical framework, we establish their widespread existence in standard datasets. Finally, we present a simple setting where we can rigorously tie the phenomena we observe in practice to a misalignment between the (human-specified) notion of robustness and the inherent geometry of the data.

Citations

Cited by

Discussions

Related