vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

Probabilistic consequence relations

2024/11/28 by Paul Égré, Égré, Paul, Ripley, Ellie
Computer Science · #03B47 #03B48 #FOS: Computer and information sciences #FOS: Mathematics #Logic (math.LO) #Logic in Computer Science (cs.LO) #Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge #Probability (math.PR)

paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2411.18849

openalex publication_date 2024/11/28 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28

Abstract

This paper investigates logical consequence defined in terms of probability distributions, for a classical propositional language using a standard notion of probability. We examine three distinct probabilistic consequence notions, which we call material consequence, preservation consequence, and symmetric consequence. While material consequence is fully classical for any threshold, preservation consequence and symmetric consequence are subclassical, with only symmetric consequence gradually approaching classical logic at the limit threshold equal to 1. Our results extend earlier results obtained by J. Paris in a SET-FMLA setting to the SET-SET setting, and consider open thresholds beside closed ones. In the SET-SET setting, in particular, they reveal that probability 1 preservation does not yield classical logic, but supervaluationism, and conversely positive probability preservation yields subvaluationism.

Related