vix.ing · top · new · best · stats

The Grass of the Universe: Rethinking Technosphere, Planetary History, and Sustainability with Fermi Paradox

2024/11/08 by Lukáš Likavčan, Likavčan, Lukáš · 6 voices · 1 citation
Physics and Astronomy · #Astrobiology #Astrophysics #Biology #Ecology #Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope #Philosophy #Physics #Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life #Sustainability #Theoretical physics #physics.hist-ph #physics.pop-ph #physics.soc-ph

paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2411.08057

published in arXiv (Cornell University) (Cornell University) · 16 pages, 1 figure, 2 equations

openalex publication_date 2024/11/08 · openalex created_date 2024/11/16 · arxiv created 2025/01/11 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28 · arxiv updated 2026/08/05

Abstract

SETI is not a usual point of departure for environmental humanities. However, this paper argues that theories originating in this field have direct implications for how we think about viable inhabitation of the Earth. To demonstrate SETI's impact on environmental humanities, this paper introduces Fermi paradox as a speculative tool to probe possible trajectories of planetary history, and especially the "Sustainability Solution" proposed by Jacob Haqq-Misra and Seth Baum. This solution suggests that sustainable coupling between extraterrestrial intelligences and their planetary environments is the major factor in the possibility of their successful detection by remote observation. By positing that exponential growth is not a sustainable development pattern, this solution rules out space-faring civilizations colonizing solar systems or galaxies. This paper elaborates on Haqq-Misra's and Baum's arguments, and discusses speculative implications of the Sustainability Solution, thus rethinking three concepts in environmental humanities: technosphere, planetary history, and sustainability. The paper advocates that (1) technosphere is a transitory layer that shall fold back into biosphere; (2) planetary history must be understood in a generic perspective that abstracts from terrestrial particularities; and (3) sustainability is not sufficient vector of viable human inhabitation of the Earth, suggesting instead habitability and genesity as better candidates.

Discussions

Related