vix.ing · top · new · best · stats

Robust Physical-World Attacks on Deep Learning Models

2017/07/27 by Kevin Eykholt, Ivan Evtimov, Eykholt, Kevin +15 · 3 voices · 508 citations
Computer Science · #Advanced Malware Detection Techniques #Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning #Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications #Artificial intelligence #Computer science #Deep learning #cs.CR #cs.LG

paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1707.08945

published in arXiv (Cornell University) (Cornell University) · Accepted to CVPR 2018

openalex publication_date 2017/07/27 · openalex created_date 2017/10/06 · arxiv created 2018/04/10 · arxiv updated 2018/04/11 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28

Abstract

Recent studies show that the state-of-the-art deep neural networks (DNNs) are vulnerable to adversarial examples, resulting from small-magnitude perturbations added to the input. Given that that emerging physical systems are using DNNs in safety-critical situations, adversarial examples could mislead these systems and cause dangerous situations.Therefore, understanding adversarial examples in the physical world is an important step towards developing resilient learning algorithms. We propose a general attack algorithm,Robust Physical Perturbations (RP2), to generate robust visual adversarial perturbations under different physical conditions. Using the real-world case of road sign classification, we show that adversarial examples generated using RP2 achieve high targeted misclassification rates against standard-architecture road sign classifiers in the physical world under various environmental conditions, including viewpoints. Due to the current lack of a standardized testing method, we propose a two-stage evaluation methodology for robust physical adversarial examples consisting of lab and field tests. Using this methodology, we evaluate the efficacy of physical adversarial manipulations on real objects. Witha perturbation in the form of only black and white stickers,we attack a real stop sign, causing targeted misclassification in 100% of the images obtained in lab settings, and in 84.8%of the captured video frames obtained on a moving vehicle(field test) for the target classifier.

Citations

Cited by

Discussions

Related