vix.ing · top · new · best · stats

Sycophantic AI decreases prosocial intentions and promotes dependence

2025/05/20 by Myra Cheng, Cheng, Myra, Cinoo Lee +10 · 20 voices · 75 citations
Computer Science · Social Sciences · #AI in Service Interactions #Accountability #Anonymity #Conviction #Dictator game #Ethics and Social Impacts of AI #Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) #Flattery #Harm #Incentive #Interpersonal communication #Prosocial behavior #Sentience #cs.AI #cs.CL #cs.CY

paper · pdf · doi:10.1126/science.aec8352

published in Science 391(6792), eaec8352 (American Association for the Advancement of Science)

openalex publication_date 2026/03/26 · openalex created_date 2026/03/27 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/05

Abstract

Despite rising concerns about sycophancy—excessive agreement or flattery from artificial intelligence (AI) systems—little is known about its prevalence or consequences. We show that sycophancy is widespread and harmful. Across 11 state-of-the-art models, AI affirmed users’ actions 49% more often than humans, even when queries involved deception, illegality, or other harms. In three preregistered experiments ( N = 2405), even a single interaction with sycophantic AI reduced participants’ willingness to take responsibility and repair interpersonal conflicts, while increasing their conviction that they were right. Despite distorting judgment, sycophantic models were trusted and preferred. This creates perverse incentives for sycophancy to persist: The very feature that causes harm also drives engagement. Our findings underscore the need for design, evaluation, and accountability mechanisms to protect user well-being.

Citations

Cited by

Discussions

Related