2022/10/25 by Sepideh Kianfar, Kianfar, Sepideh, J. Leenaarts +9
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology · Physics and Astronomy · #FOS: Physical sciences #Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies #Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics #Solar and Stellar Astrophysics (astro-ph.SR) #Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2210.14089
openalex publication_date 2022/10/25 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/30
Fibrils in the solar chromosphere carry transverse oscillations as determined from non-spectroscopic imaging data. They are estimated to carry an energy flux of several kW~m-2, which is a significant fraction of the average chromospheric radiative energy losses. We aim to determine oscillation properties of fibrils not only in the plane-of-the-sky (horizontal) direction, but also along the line-of-sight (vertical) direction. We obtained imaging-spectroscopy data in Fe~I, Ca~II~IR, and Ca~II~K with the Swedish 1-m Solar Telescope. We created a sample of 605 bright Ca~II~K fibrils and measured their horizontal motions. Their vertical motion was determined through non-LTE inversion of the observed spectra. We determined the periods and velocity amplitudes of the fibril oscillations, as well as phase differences between vertical and horizontal oscillations in the fibrils. The bright Ca~II~K fibrils carry transverse waves with a mean period of 2.1×102~s, and a horizontal velocity amplitude of 1~km~s-1, consistent with earlier results. The mean vertical velocity amplitude is 1.1~km~s-1. We find that 77% of the fibrils carry waves in both the vertical and horizontal directions, and 80% of this subsample exhibits oscillations with similar periods in both horizontal and vertical directions. For the latter, we find that all phase differences between 0 and 2π occur, with a mild but significant preference for linearly polarized waves (phase difference of 0 or π). The results are consistent with the scenario where transverse waves are excited by granular buffeting at the photospheric footpoints of the fibrils. Estimates of transverse wave flux based only on imaging data are too low because they ignore the contribution of the vertical velocity.