vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

Why scientific publications should be anonymous

2015/12/16 by Paul H. P. Hanel, Hanel, Paul H. P. · 2 voices
Computer Science · Decision Sciences · #Academic Publishing and Open Access #Web visibility and informetrics #cs.DL #scientometrics and bibliometrics research

paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1512.05382

openalex publication_date 2015/12/16 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28

Abstract

Numerous studies have revealed biases within the scientific communication system and across all scientific fields. For example, already prominent researchers receive disproportional credit compared to their (almost) equally qualified colleagues -- because of their prominence. However, none of those studies has offered a solution as to how to decrease the incidence of these biases. In this paper I argue that by publishing anonymously, we can decrease the incidence of inaccurate heuristics in the current scientific communication system. Specific suggestions are made as to how to implement the changes.

Citations

Discussions

Related