The Matthew effect in science funding
2018/04/23 by Thijs Bol, Mathijs de Vaan, Arnout van de Rijt · 1 voice · 71 citations
Decision Sciences · #scientometrics and bibliometrics research
paper · pdf · doi:10.1073/pnas.1719557115
Abstract
A classic thesis is that scientific achievement exhibits a "Matthew effect": Scientists who have previously been successful are more likely to succeed again, producing increasing distinction. We investigate to what extent the Matthew effect drives the allocation of research funds. To this end, we assembled a dataset containing all review scores and funding decisions of grant proposals submitted by recent PhDs in a €2 billion granting program. Analyses of review scores reveal that early funding success introduces a growing rift, with winners just above the funding threshold accumulating more than twice as much research funding (€180,000) during the following eight years as nonwinners just below it. We find no evidence that winners' improved funding chances in subsequent competitions are due to achievements enabled by the preceding grant, which suggests that early funding itself is an asset for acquiring later funding. Surprisingly, however, the emergent funding gap is partly created by applicants, who, after failing to win one grant, apply for another grant less often.
Cited by
- Language, economic and gender disparities widen the scientific productivity gap
- Introduction to structural causal models in science studies
- Professors in the media: dynamics of cumulative advantage, reputation, and gender
- The Matthew effect and early-career setbacks in research funding—a replication study
- Luck can explain the positive link between fecundity and longevity: the Matthew effect in social insects and beyond
- TALENT VERSUS LUCK: THE ROLE OF RANDOMNESS IN SUCCESS AND FAILURE
- The entities enabling scientific fraud at scale are large, resilient, and growing rapidly
- Non-White scientists appear on fewer editorial boards, spend more time under review, and receive fewer citations
- Why Large Language Models and Humans Converge and Diverge in Evaluating Creativity
- Unseen costs: the inequities of the geography of innovation
- The plateauing of cognitive ability among top earners
- Gender and Discipline Shape Length, Content and Tone of Grant Peer Review Reports
- The use of informetric methods to study diversity in the scientific workforce: A literature review
- Best Paper awards lack transparency, inclusivity, and support for Open Science
- The effect of publicly co-funded industry-science collaboration on scientific production
- Configurational determinants of time-to-win in NSFC youth program funding: Insights from Chinese library and information science
- Variability in and mixtures among residential vacancies at granular levels: Evidence from municipal water consumption data
- One capability, many outcomes: unpacking AI dynamic capabilities in scientific teams
- Civil disobedience in scientific authorship: Resistance and insubordination in science
- Responsible Research Assessment I: Implementing DORA and CoARA for hiring and promotion in psychology
- How bad gatekeepers undermine good science
- The pivot penalty in research
- How gender determines the way we speak about professionals
- Triangle of inequalities: gender, research funding and open access in Spain
- English or Perish? The Value of Linguistic Capital in the Social Sciences and Humanities
- Scooped! Estimating Rewards for Priority in Science
- Rethinking academia in a time of climate crisis
- Status compensation effect in grant applications: applicants of lower status create longer titles for their grant proposals in China
- Aging and the Narrowing of Scientific Innovation
- Emergence of Structural Disparities in the Web of Scientific Citations
- Hope, Signals, and Silicon: A Game-Theoretic Model of the Pre-Doctoral Academic Labor Market in the Age of AI
- Exploring biocultural diversity: A systematic analysis and refined classification to inform decisions on conservation and sustainability
- Ranking-based sanctions for retraction-afflicted elite researchers
- Do researchers from prestigious universities deserve advantages in research funding? Evidence from the National Natural Science Foundation of China
- The practicalities of a partial lottery to allocate research funding
- Configurational determinants of time to ERC-PoC grants: take the panel of computer science & informatics as an example
- The innovation trade-off: how following superstars shapes academic novelty
- Field size as a predictor of “excellence.” The selection of subject fields in Germany’s Excellence Initiative
- Do grant proposal texts matter for funding decisions? A field experiment
- Dominance of leading business schools in top journals: Insights for increasing institutional representation
- Towards inclusive funding practices for early career researchers
- Does public R&D funding reinforce regional disparities? Exploring the changing geography of public and business R&D expenditure in Europe
- Bio-Ontologies, Epistemic Diversity, and Epistemic Justice: Data Curation and the Case Against ‘Excellence’
- Performance-based research funding and its impacts on research performance
- The effect of past successes on the probability of a current success: evidence from a natural experiment
- The Matthew effect in SDG-related architectural research: a scientometric analysis of global productivity and citation inequality
- Funding the Frontier: Visualizing the Broad Impact of Science and Science Funding
- Show Me the Money: Successfully Obtaining Grant Funding in Medical Education. [europepmc]
- Open science and modified funding lotteries can impede the natural selection of bad science. [europepmc]
- Early-career setback and future career impact. [europepmc]
- Research priorities for liver glycogen storage disease: An international priority setting partnership with the James Lind Alliance. [europepmc]
- Topic choice contributes to the lower rate of NIH awards to African-American/black scientists. [europepmc]
- Gender Disparities in Invited Commentary Authorship in 2459 Medical Journals. [europepmc]
- The Wiring of Intelligence. [europepmc]
- A decade of decline: Grant funding for researchers with disabilities 2008 to 2018. [europepmc]
- Mentorship and protégé success in STEM fields. [europepmc]
- Effect of interpopulation spike-timing-dependent plasticity on synchronized rhythms in neuronal networks with inhibitory and excitatory populations. [europepmc]
- Improving data access democratizes and diversifies science. [europepmc]
- The leaky pipeline in research grant peer review and funding decisions: challenges and future directions. [europepmc]
- Gender gaps in research productivity and recognition among elite scientists in the U.S., Canada, and South Africa. [europepmc]
- When we can trust computers (and when we can't). [europepmc]
- Introducing the Microbes and Social Equity Working Group: Considering the Microbial Components of Social, Environmental, and Health Justice. [europepmc]
- Vision, challenges and opportunities for a Plant Cell Atlas. [europepmc]
- The characteristics of early-stage research into human genes are substantially different from subsequent research. [europepmc]
- Dynamics of cumulative advantage and threats to equity in open science: a scoping review. [europepmc]
- The ecology of wealth inequality in animal societies. [europepmc]
- Systemic racial disparities in funding rates at the National Science Foundation. [europepmc]
- A guide to megastudies. [europepmc]
- Rethinking academia in a time of climate crisis. [europepmc]
- Competitive social feedback amplifies the role of early life contingency in male mice. [europepmc]
- The pivot penalty in research. [europepmc]
- The entities enabling scientific fraud at scale are large, resilient, and growing rapidly. [europepmc]
Discussions
Related