vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

WhaleNet: a Novel Deep Learning Architecture for Marine Mammals Vocalizations on Watkins Marine Mammal Sound Database

2024/02/20 by Alessandro Licciardi, Davide Carbone, Licciardi, Alessandro +1 · 2 citations
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology · Environmental Science · #Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior #Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) #Audio and Speech Processing (eess.AS) #Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV) #FOS: Computer and information sciences #FOS: Electrical engineering #Machine Learning (cs.LG) #Marine animal studies overview #Signal Processing (eess.SP) #Sound (cs.SD) #electronic engineering #information engineering

paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.17775

openalex publication_date 2024/02/20 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28

Abstract

Marine mammal communication is a complex field, hindered by the diversity of vocalizations and environmental factors. The Watkins Marine Mammal Sound Database (WMMD) constitutes a comprehensive labeled dataset employed in machine learning applications. Nevertheless, the methodologies for data preparation, preprocessing, and classification documented in the literature exhibit considerable variability and are typically not applied to the dataset in its entirety. This study initially undertakes a concise review of the state-of-the-art benchmarks pertaining to the dataset, with a particular focus on clarifying data preparation and preprocessing techniques. Subsequently, we explore the utilization of the Wavelet Scattering Transform (WST) and Mel spectrogram as preprocessing mechanisms for feature extraction. In this paper, we introduce WhaleNet (Wavelet Highly Adaptive Learning Ensemble Network), a sophisticated deep ensemble architecture for the classification of marine mammal vocalizations, leveraging both WST and Mel spectrogram for enhanced feature discrimination. By integrating the insights derived from WST and Mel representations, we achieved an improvement in classification accuracy by 8-10% over existing architectures, corresponding to a classification accuracy of 97.61%.

Cited by

Related