vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

Multi-objective Pointer Network for Combinatorial Optimization

2022/04/25 by Le-yang Gao, Gao, Le-yang, Rui Wang +5 · 1 citation
Computer Science · #Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms #Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) #FOS: Computer and information sciences #Machine Learning (cs.LG) #Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research

paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2204.11860

openalex publication_date 2022/04/25 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28

Abstract

Multi-objective combinatorial optimization problems (MOCOPs), one type of complex optimization problems, widely exist in various real applications. Although meta-heuristics have been successfully applied to address MOCOPs, the calculation time is often much longer. Recently, a number of deep reinforcement learning (DRL) methods have been proposed to generate approximate optimal solutions to the combinatorial optimization problems. However, the existing studies on DRL have seldom focused on MOCOPs. This study proposes a single-model deep reinforcement learning framework, called multi-objective Pointer Network (MOPN), where the input structure of PN is effectively improved so that the single PN is capable of solving MOCOPs. In addition, two training strategies, based on representative model and transfer learning, respectively, are proposed to further enhance the performance of MOPN in different application scenarios. Moreover, compared to classical meta-heuristics, MOPN only consumes much less time on forward propagation to obtain the Pareto front. Meanwhile, MOPN is insensitive to problem scale, meaning that a trained MOPN is able to address MOCOPs with different scales. To verify the performance of MOPN, extensive experiments are conducted on three multi-objective traveling salesman problems, in comparison with one state-of-the-art model DRL-MOA and three classical multi-objective meta-heuristics. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed model outperforms all the comparative methods with only 20% to 40% training time of DRL-MOA.

Cited by

Related