2022/12/03 by Michal Štefánik, Štefánik, Michal, Marek Kadlčík +1 · 3 citations
Computer Science · #Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) #Computation and Language (cs.CL) #FOS: Computer and information sciences #Machine Learning (cs.LG) #Multimodal Machine Learning Applications #Natural Language Processing Techniques #Topic Modeling
paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2212.01692
openalex publication_date 2022/12/03 · openalex created_date 2022/12/18 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28
Language models exhibit an emergent ability to learn a new task from a small number of input-output demonstrations. However, recent work shows that in-context learners largely rely on their pre-trained knowledge, such as the sentiment of the labels, instead of learning new associations from the input. We argue that the commonly-used few-shot evaluation using a random selection of in-context demonstrations can not disentangle models' reliance on such biases, as most of the randomly-selected demonstrations do not present relations informative for prediction beyond exposing the task's input-output distribution. Therefore, to evaluate models' in-context learning ability independent of models' memory, we introduce a Concept-sharing few-shot learning method choosing the demonstrations that share an underlying concept with the predicted sample. We extract a set of such concepts from available human explanations and measure how much models can benefit from presenting these concepts in few-shot demonstrations. We find that most of the recent in-context learners can not consistently benefit from the demonstrated concepts, irrespective of the model size. However, we note that T0 models are more sensitive to exhibited concepts, benefiting from concept-sharing demonstrations in 7 out of 8 evaluation scenarios.