Who sets the agenda and who responds to it in the Danish parliament? A new model of issue competition and agenda‐setting

2009/12/03 by Christoffer Green‐Pedersen, Peter B. Mortensen, Peter Bjerre Mortensen · 524 citations
Business, Management and Accounting · Social Sciences · #Competition (biology) #Danish #Economics #Electoral Systems and Political Participation #Government (linguistics) #Law #Law and economics #Opposition (politics) #Parliament #Political Influence and Corporate Strategies #Political economy #Political science #Politics #Public administration #Public relations #Social Policy and Reform Studies

paper · doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.2009.01897.x

published in European Journal of Political Research 49(2), 257-281 (Wiley)

openalex publication_date 2009/12/03 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/04

Abstract

Abstract Inspired by the agenda‐setting literature, this article outlines a model of issue competition focusing on the interaction between government and opposition parties through the party‐system agenda. Unlike previous studies of issue competition, the model makes it possible to answer questions such as why some parties have greater success than others in forcing other parties to address unpleasant issues. One of the central implications of the model is that opposition parties are freer to focus continually on issues that are advantageous to themselves, whereas government parties more often are forced to respond to issues brought up on the party‐system agenda. Using data on issue competition in Denmark covering 25 years and 23 issue categories, the issue competition model is evaluated and finds strong support in a set of cross‐sectional time‐series analyses.

Citations

• What To Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data
• Specification Tests in Econometrics
• Immigration as a political issue in Denmark and Sweden
• Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-spectral Methods

Cited by

• When does accommodation fail? The electoral consequences of intra-party divisions and mainstream party strategies
• How parties can shape their competence reputations: Issue attention, position and performance
• Voting for Votes: Opposition Parties’ Legislative Activity and Electoral Outcomes
• Niche Party Success and Mainstream Party Policy Shifts – How Green and Radical Right Parties Differ in Their Impact
• The Diminishing Value of Representing the Disadvantaged: Between Group Representation and Individual Career Paths
• Party Reputations and Policy Priorities: How Issue Ownership Shapes Executive and Legislative Agendas
• To Oppose or Not to Oppose? Strategies of Opposition Parties’ Parliamentary Support for Government Legislation
• Moderate as Necessary: The Role of Electoral Competitiveness and Party Size in Explaining Parties’ Policy Shifts
• Does accommodation work? Mainstream party strategies and the success of radical right parties
• Issue ownership and government participation: Explaining parties’ issue attention at the subnational level
• Do Parties Matter for Environmental Policy Stringency? Exploring the Program-to-Policy Link for Environmental Issues in 28 Countries 1990–2015
• Win Some, Lose None? Support Parties at the Polls and in Political Agenda-Setting
• A formal model of party competition with salience
• Issue Diversification: Which Niche Parties Can Succeed Electorally by Broadening Their Agenda?
• Attacks and Issue Competition: Do Parties Attack Based on Issue Salience or Issue Ownership?
• The behaviour of populist parties in parliament. The policy agendas of populist and other political parties in the Italian question time
• Do more inclusive parties change less? Intraparty democracy and programmatic change
• Right-wing populism and territorial party competition: The case of the Alternative for Germany
• Parliamentary questions as an intra-coalition control mechanism in mixed regimes
• Is the populist Robin Hood a fairy tale? Parliamentary attention to social welfare
• When do parties put Europe in the centre? Evidence from the 2019 European Parliament election campaign
• Party responsiveness to public opinion in a multi-dimensional policy space
• The impact of occupational background on issue representation
• Explaining Europe’s transformed electoral landscape: structure, salience, and agendas
• Social Media and Political Agenda Setting
• Populism in the EU and the trade-off between ethical claiming and mainstreaming
• Legislative Oversight and Control of Independent Portfolios: Government and Opposition Dynamics
• Initiate and Elevate! How Political Parties Can Set an Agenda
• Parliamentary questions to the House of Commons Commission: Accountability and parliamentary administration
• Electoral Campaigns and Parliamentary Practice: Do Parties Pursue the Issues They Campaigned On?
• The Impact of Institutional and Financial Constraints on Party Behaviour in Local Politics
• The impact of public opinion on voting and policymaking
• Green matters? The effects of green party support, autonomy and capacity on subnational environmental infringements
• The consequences of appearing divided: An analysis of party evaluations and vote choice
• Rethinking political space in Europe: the modernisation and globalisation dimensions
• Who gets to speak for the party? How parliamentary party groups select spokespersons
• From There to Here: Punctuated Equilibrium to the General Punctuation Thesis to a Theory of Government Information Processing
• The PARTYPRESS Database: A new comparative database of parties’ press releases
• Which Factors Influence Issue Salience in Electoral Manifestos? New Insights From the Salience of Social Services in Dutch Local Elections
• Trust in science during the pandemic: an ideological fracture or just a matter of government vs opposition?
• Moralism without populism? The salience of corruption in the electoral manifestos and legislature speeches of Czech and Slovak parties
• The Unequal Distribution of Speaking Time in Parliamentary‐Party Groups
• Introducing the Intergovernmental Policy Output Dataset (IPOD). [europepmc]
• Associative issue ownership in a highly fragmented multiparty context: The Netherlands (2021). [europepmc]
• The Force of Law? Transparency of Scientific Advice in Times of Covid-19 [europepmc]

Related

• The Growing Importance of Issue Competition: The Changing Nature of Party Competition in Western Europe
• Issue Competition in Parliamentary Speeches? A Computer‐based Content Analysis of Legislative Debates in the Austrian Nationalrat
• Initiate and Elevate! How Political Parties Can Set an Agenda
• To Oppose or Not to Oppose? Strategies of Opposition Parties’ Parliamentary Support for Government Legislation
• Competing on competence: the issue profiles of mainstream parties in Western Europe