Short commentary on comparing previous claim of RT superconductivity\n with the data of arXiv:1807.08572, "Evidence for Superconductivity at Ambient\n Temperature and Pressure in Nanostructures"

2018/08/14 by D. Singh, Singh, Deepak K., Deepak K. Singh
Physics and Astronomy · #Advanced Chemical Physics Studies #FOS: Physical sciences #Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism #Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics #Strongly Correlated Electrons (cond-mat.str-el) #Superconductivity (cond-mat.supr-con)

paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1808.04912

openalex publication_date 2018/08/14 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28

Abstract

I briefly mention a previous claim of room temperature superconductivity (\narXiv:0905.3524) in Ag-based oxide material and compare their results with the\nmost recent claim of ambient temperature superconductivity in arXiv:1807.08572.\nIn both cases, an electrical transition to low resistance state and\ndiamagnetism are observed. Silver is a common ingredient in both claims. Does\nit mean that silver holds the key to RT superconductivity or, the missing field\ncool data (in both reports) hint of some other physical phenomenon than\nsuperconductivity.\n

Related

• Repeated noise pattern in the data of arXiv:1807.08572, "Evidence for\n Superconductivity at Ambient Temperature and Pressure in Nanostructures"
• Short Note on Superconductivity at Ambient Temperature and Pressure in\n Silver Embedded Gold Nano-particles: A Goldsmith job ahead
• A comment on percolation and signatures of superconductivity in Au/Ag nanostructures
• Comment on arXiv:1807.08572: a plausible explanation of the giant diamagnetism found in Au-Ag nanostructures
• Superconductors with Superconducting Transition Temperatures Tc = 91K (1999), 120K (1994), 340K (2000), and 371K (1995): Experimental Errors or a Technological Puzzle? Two-Component Nonstoichiometric Compounds and the Insulator--Superconductor--Metal Transition