Scientists no Longer Find Twitter Professionally Useful, and have Switched to Bluesky
2025/07/10 by David S. Shiffman, Julia Wester · 12 voices · 1 citation
Social Sciences · #Social Media in Health Education
paper · doi:10.1093/icb/icaf127
Abstract
Social media has become widely used by the scientific community for a variety of professional uses, including networking and public outreach. For the past decade, Twitter has been a primary home of scientists on social media. In recent years, new leadership at Twitter has made substantive changes that have resulted in increases in the prevalence of pseudoscience, conspiracy theory, and harassment on the platform, causing many scientists to seek alternatives. Bluesky has been suggested as a good alternative to Twitter, but the phenomenon of academics switching social media platforms has not previously been studied. Here we report on the results of a survey distributed to scientists on Twitter and Bluesky (n = 813). Results overwhelmingly confirm that changes to Twitter have made the social media platform no longer professionally useful or pleasant, and that many scientists have abandoned it in favor of Bluesky. Results show that for every reported professional benefit that scientists once gained from Twitter, scientists can now gain that benefit more effectively on Bluesky than on Twitter.
Cited by
Discussions
- Hey everybody! @drjuliawester.bsky.social and I have a new paper! We surveyed over 800 scientists, science communicators, and science educators who use social media. Conclusion: Scientists no longe [bsky, 3787 points, 85 comments]
- HT @katharinehayhoe.com for sharing this! (Source: doi.org/10.1093/icb/...) [bsky, 8 points, 1 comments]
- Scientists no Longer Find Twitter Professionally Useful, and have Switched to Bluesky Shiffman+ doi.org/10.1093/icb/... "for scientists and science communicators...Bluesky should be considered inste [bsky, 5 points, 0 comments]
- ICB’s Article doi.org/10.1093/icb/... has been getting quite a bit of positive attention! @wired.com coverage & and then the newsletter Journalogy. This has led to over 5000 social media mentions! [bsky, 4 points, 0 comments]
- Interesting reading - Bluesky becomes scientists favourite platform over X, due to lack of hatespeach, conspiracy theories and pseudoscience, a survey among 800 scientists show doi.org/10.1093/icb/.. [bsky, 3 points, 0 comments]
- Shiffman & Wester (2025-07, Integrative and Comparative Biology) 「科学者らはもはやTwitterを研究・仕事上有用とは考えておらず,Blueskyへ移行している」 Scientists no Longer Find Twitter Professionally Useful, and have Switched to Bluesky [bsky, 2 points, 1 comments]
- Scientists no Longer Find Twitter Professionally Useful, and have Switched to Bluesky doi.org/10.1093/icb/... @whysharksmatter.bsky.social · @drjuliawester.bsky.social [bsky, 1 points, 0 comments]
- Journal Article Corrected proof Scientists no Longer Find Twitter Professionally Useful, and have Switched to Bluesky Get access Arrow D S Shiffman , J Wester Integrative and Comparative Biology, icaf [bsky, 1 points, 0 comments]
- BTW: "... for every reported professional benefit that scientists once gained from Twitter, scientists can now gain that benefit more effectively on Bluesky than on Twitter." doi.org/10.1093/icb/... [bsky, 1 points, 0 comments]
- Journal Article Corrected proof Scientists no Longer Find Twitter Professionally Useful, and have Switched to Bluesky Get access Arrow D S Shiffman , J Wester Integrative and Comparative Biology, icaf [bsky, 0 points, 0 comments]
- Switch to Bluesky doi.org/10.1093/icb/... [bsky, 0 points, 0 comments]
- This... Scientists no Longer Find Twitter Professionally Useful, and have Switched to Bluesky doi.org/10.1093/icb/... [bsky, 0 points, 0 comments]
Related