LLMs Get Lost In Multi-Turn Conversation
2025/05/09 by Philippe Laban, Laban, Philippe, Hiroaki Hayashi +5 · 41 voices · 109 citations
Computer Science · #Natural Language Processing Techniques #Text Readability and Simplification #Topic Modeling #cs.CL #cs.HC
paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.06120
openalex publication_date 2025/05/09 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) are conversational interfaces. As such, LLMs have the potential to assist their users not only when they can fully specify the task at hand, but also to help them define, explore, and refine what they need through multi-turn conversational exchange. Although analysis of LLM conversation logs has confirmed that underspecification occurs frequently in user instructions, LLM evaluation has predominantly focused on the single-turn, fully-specified instruction setting. In this work, we perform large-scale simulation experiments to compare LLM performance in single- and multi-turn settings. Our experiments confirm that all the top open- and closed-weight LLMs we test exhibit significantly lower performance in multi-turn conversations than single-turn, with an average drop of 39% across six generation tasks. Analysis of 200,000+ simulated conversations decomposes the performance degradation into two components: a minor loss in aptitude and a significant increase in unreliability. We find that LLMs often make assumptions in early turns and prematurely attempt to generate final solutions, on which they overly rely. In simpler terms, we discover that *when LLMs take a wrong turn in a conversation, they get lost and do not recover*.
Citations
Cited by
Discussions
- LLMs get lost in multi-turn conversation [hn, 374 points, 259 comments]
- “Our experiments confirm that all the top open- and closed-weight LLMs we test exhibit significantly lower performance in multi-turn conversations than single-turn, with an average drop of 39% across [bsky, 47 points, 5 comments]
- Recommended reading. An anecdotal observation many regular LLM users share, quantified. arxiv.org/pdf/2505.06120 [bsky, 22 points, 3 comments]
- arxiv.org/abs/2505.06120 [bsky, 6 points, 0 comments]
- LLMs in general are actually sort of bad at multi turn conversation, in that they have trouble distinguishing correct from incorrect: arxiv.org/abs/2505.06120 [bsky, 5 points, 1 comments]
- oops, forgot to add the link to the paper - arxiv.org/abs/2505.06120 [bsky, 4 points, 0 comments]
- "when LLMs take a wrong turn in a conversation, they get lost and do not recover" arxiv.org/abs/2505.06120 [bsky, 2 points, 0 comments]
- I saw this paper shared recently which quantifies the degradation when specifying everything up-front to an LLM vs taking multiple turns to specify the problem arxiv.org/pdf/2505.06120 [bsky, 2 points, 0 comments]
- Tip: If you use current LLMs for problem-solving or with a goal in mind, you need to be as comprehensive as possible in the first prompt to get the best performance. arxiv.org/abs/2505.06120 [bsky, 1 points, 1 comments]
- YES I HAVE NOTICED arxiv.org/abs/2505.06120 [bsky, 1 points, 0 comments]
- Large language models (LLMs) see a 39% drop in effectiveness in multi-turn dialogues versus single-turn tasks due to their tendency for hasty assumptions and premature response finalization, leading t [bsky, 1 points, 0 comments]
- Every major AI model gets dramatically worse the longer you talk to it. There are big losses in aptitude and even bigger increases in unreliability. [bsky, 1 points, 0 comments]
- This is a interesting microsoft paper arxiv.org/abs/2505.06120 [bsky, 1 points, 0 comments]
- LLMs performance degradation in multi-turn conversations [bsky, 1 points, 0 comments]
- LLMs Get Lost in Multi-Turn Conversation [bsky, 1 points, 0 comments]
- LLMs get lost in multi-turn conversation View Article | Join the HN Conversation Summary of HN discussion 🧵👇 #hacker-news [bsky, 0 points, 1 comments]
- (비전문가 대충 읽음) LLM 하곤 대화를 길게, 순차적으로 이어나갈 수록 오류가 폭증한다고. 반드시 질의를 한 번에 입력해야 한다는데 그래서 XML 형태로 입력하는게 더 효율적인가 싶고... 기존 AI 벤치마크는 전부 질답 한 번 기준이라고 한다. arxiv.org/abs/2505.06120 [bsky, 0 points, 0 comments]
- LLMs get lost in multi-turn conversation https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.06120 [bsky, 0 points, 0 comments]
- ⚡ Hackernews Top story: LLMs Get Lost in Multi-Turn Conversation [bsky, 0 points, 0 comments]
- LLMs get lost in multi-turn conversation https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.06120 (http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43991256) [bsky, 0 points, 0 comments]
- LLMs get lost in multi-turn conversation https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.06120 (http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43991256) [bsky, 0 points, 0 comments]
- LLMs Get Lost In Multi-Turn Conversation https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.06120 [bsky, 0 points, 0 comments]
- https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.06120 大規模言語モデル(LLM)は、複数ターンの対話で文脈を把握し、一貫性を保つのが苦手であるという研究。 特に、会話が長くなるにつれて、LLMは以前の発言を忘れ、矛盾した応答を生成する傾向がある。 この問題を解決するために、研究者たちは、LLMが会話履歴をより効果的に利用できるようにする新しい手法を提案している。 [bsky, 0 points, 0 comments]
- LLM get wronger the more they talk to people arxiv.org/abs/2505.06120 There’s something fundamentally broken about both #AI #metacognition and its #ActiveListening capability [bsky, 0 points, 0 comments]
- LLMs Get Lost in Multi-Turn Conversation view on hacker news [bsky, 0 points, 0 comments]
- LLMs get lost in multi-turn conversation https:// arxiv.org/abs/2505.06120 # arxiv # llm # llms [mastodon, 0 points, 0 comments]
- arxiv.org/pdf/2505.0612 Laban, et al, 2025, Arxiv, “LLMs get lost in Multi-Turn Conversations” Consistent with: Shumailov, et al, “AI models collapse when trained on recursively generated data,” Natur [bsky, 0 points, 0 comments]
- LLMs Get Lost In Multi-Turn Conversation arxiv.org/abs/2505.06120 [bsky, 0 points, 0 comments]
- LLMs Get Lost in Multi-Turn Conversation https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.06120 (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43991256) [bsky, 0 points, 0 comments]
- LLMs get lost in multi-turn conversation https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.06120 (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43991256) [bsky, 0 points, 0 comments]
- LLMs Get Lost in Multi-Turn Conversation https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.06120 (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43991256) [bsky, 0 points, 0 comments]
- LLMs Get Lost In Multi-Turn Conversation arxiv.org/abs/2505.06120 [bsky, 0 points, 0 comments]
- arxiv.org/abs/2505.06120 [bsky, 0 points, 0 comments]
- arxiv.org/abs/2505.06120 [bsky, 0 points, 0 comments]
- "LLMs tend to (1) generate overly verbose responses, leading them to (2) propose final solutions prematurely in conversation, (3) make incorrect assumptions about underspecified details, and (4) rely [bsky, 0 points, 1 comments]
- "LLMs get lost in multi-turn conversation" LLMs struggle with keeping track of conversations. Without clear context, they get confused and give poor quality answers. Managing context is really importa [bsky, 0 points, 0 comments]
- https://bsky.app/profile/hackernews.com.web.brid.gy/post/3lp72k3mgfox2 [bsky, 0 points, 0 comments]
- LLMs Get Lost in Multi-Turn Conversation #HackerNews https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.06120 [bsky, 0 points, 0 comments]
- LLMs Get Lost in Multi-Turn Conversation https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.06120 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43991256 [bsky, 0 points, 0 comments]
- LLMs get lost in multi-turn conversation https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.06120 arxiv.org [bsky, 0 points, 0 comments]
- LLMs Get Lost in Multi-Turn Conversation https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.06120 [bsky, 0 points, 0 comments]
Related