2025/05/20 by Hiba Arnaout, Arnaout, Hiba, Noy Sternlicht +5 · 1 voice · 1 citation
Computer Science · #Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) #Digital Libraries (cs.DL) #FOS: Computer and information sciences #cs.AI #cs.DL
paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.14838
arxiv published 2025/05/20 · arxiv updated 2026/04/16
Understanding the impact of scientific publications is crucial for identifying breakthroughs and guiding future research. Traditional metrics based on citation counts often miss the nuanced ways a paper contributes to its field. In this work, we propose a new task: generating nuanced, expressive, and time-aware impact summaries that capture both praise (confirmation citations) and critique (correction citations) through the evolution of fine-grained citation intents. We introduce an evaluation framework tailored to this task, showing moderate to strong human correlation on subjective metrics such as insightfulness. Expert feedback from professors reveals a strong interest in these summaries and suggests future improvements. Data and code are made available.