Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence: Reliable, Safe & Trustworthy
2020/02/10 by Ben Shneiderman, Shneiderman, Ben · 45 citations
Psychology · Health Professions · Medicine · #Human-Automation Interaction and Safety #Occupational Health and Safety Research #Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2002.04087
Abstract
Well-designed technologies that offer high levels of human control and high levels of computer automation can increase human performance, leading to wider adoption. The Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence (HCAI) framework clarifies how to (1) design for high levels of human control and high levels of computer automation so as to increase human performance, (2) understand the situations in which full human control or full computer control are necessary, and (3) avoid the dangers of excessive human control or excessive computer control. The methods of HCAI are more likely to produce designs that are Reliable, Safe & Trustworthy (RST). Achieving these goals will dramatically increase human performance, while supporting human self-efficacy, mastery, creativity, and responsibility.
Cited by
- AI Assistance for Discretionary Work: Increasing Feedback Provision in Higher Education
- Verification Without Distrust: Reframing User-Side Oversight as Routine Epistemic Governance in Everyday Human-Chatbot Interaction
- Agentic Explainable Artificial Intelligence (Agentic XAI) Approach To Explore Better Explanation
- Forgetful but Faithful: A Cognitive Memory Architecture and Benchmark for Privacy-Aware Generative Agents
- Human-in-the-Loop and AI: Crowdsourcing Metadata Vocabulary for Materials Science
- From Challenge to Change: Design Principles for AI Transformations
- CentaurEval: Benchmarking Human-in-the-Loop Value in Agentic Coding
- Bug Detective and Quality Coach: Developers' Mental Models of AI-Assisted IDE Tools
- Evaluating the Ability of Large Language Models to Identify Adherence to CONSORT Reporting Guidelines in Randomized Controlled Trials: A Methodological Evaluation Study
- Portal UX Agent -- A Plug-and-Play Engine for Rendering UIs from Natural Language Specifications
- Design Considerations for Human Oversight of AI: Insights from Co-Design Workshops and Work Design Theory
- "Over-the-Hood" AI Inclusivity Bugs and How 3 AI Product Teams Found and Fixed Them
- Plural Voices, Single Agent: Towards Inclusive AI in Multi-User Domestic Spaces
- DeTAILS: Deep Thematic Analysis with Iterative LLM Support
- Agentic AI as Undercover Teammates: Argumentative Knowledge Construction in Hybrid Human-AI Collaborative Learning
- VizCopilot: Fostering Appropriate Reliance on Enterprise Chatbots with Context Visualization
- Exploring Artificial Intelligence and Culture: Methodology for a comparative study of AI's impact on norms, trust, and problem-solving across academic and business environments
- When Should Users Check? A Decision-Theoretic Model of Confirmation Frequency in Multi-Step AI Agent Tasks
- From keywords to semantics: Perceptions of large language models in data discovery
- AI Where It Matters: Where, Why, and How Developers Want AI Support in Daily Work
- The Grammar of FAIR: A Granular Architecture of Semantic Units for FAIR Semantics, Inspired by Biology and Linguistics
- Empowering the creative design process through LLM-based support tools
- Beyond Chat: a Framework for LLMs as Human-Centered Support Systems
- Perspectra: Choosing Your Experts Enhances Critical Thinking in Multi-Agent Research Ideation
- ChatGPT: More Than a “Weapon of Mass Deception” Ethical Challenges and Responses from the Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence (HCAI) Perspective
- Reshaping Higher Education Designs and Futures: Postdigital Co-design with Generative Artificial Intelligence
- ClassMind: Scaling Classroom Observation and Instructional Feedback with Multimodal AI
- I, Robot? Exploring Ultra-Personalized AI-Powered AAC; an Autoethnographic Account
- Participatory AI: A Scandinavian Approach to Human-Centered AI
- Harnessing the Power of AI in Qualitative Research: Role Assignment, Engagement, and User Perceptions of AI-Generated Follow-Up Questions in Semi-Structured Interviews
- Secure human oversight of AI: Threat modeling in a socio-technical context
- PersoNo: Personalised Notification Urgency Classifier in Mixed Reality
- From Checking to Sensemaking: A Caregiver-in-the-Loop Framework for AI-Assisted Task Verification in Dementia Care
- From Passive Tool to Socio-cognitive Teammate: A Conceptual Framework for Agentic AI in Human-AI Collaborative Learning
- Eliminating Rasterization: Direct Vector Floor Plan Generation with DiffPlanner
- Grand Challenge: Mediating Between Confirmatory and Exploratory Research Cultures in Health Sciences and Visual Analytics
- When the Domain Expert Has No Time and the LLM Developer Has No Clinical Expertise: Real-World Lessons from LLM Co-Design in a Safety-Net Hospital
- Towards Transparent Ethical AI: A Roadmap for Trustworthy Robotic Systems
- Human-Centered Human-AI Interaction (HC-HAII): A Human-Centered AI Perspective
- Context-Aware Visualization for Explainable AI Recommendations in Social Media: A Vision for User-Aligned Explanations
- CTG-Insight: A Multi-Agent Interpretable LLM Framework for Cardiotocography Analysis and Classification
- MatSci-YAMZ: Integrating Human and Artificial Intelligence Vocabulary
- Fail Fast, or Ask: Mitigating the Deficiencies of Reasoning LLMs with Human-in-the-Loop Systems Engineering
- Evolving Roles of LLMs in Scientific Innovation: Assistant, Collaborator, Scientist, and Evaluator
- Combining Human-centred Explainability and Explainable AI
Related