vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

Detecting ChatGPT: A Survey of the State of Detecting ChatGPT-Generated Text

2023/09/14 by Mahdi Dhaini, Wessel Poelman, Dhaini, Mahdi +3 · 1 citation
Computer Science · Medicine · #Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) #Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education #Computation and Language (cs.CL) #FOS: Computer and information sciences #Text Readability and Simplification #Topic Modeling

paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2309.07689

openalex publication_date 2023/09/14 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28

Abstract

While recent advancements in the capabilities and widespread accessibility of generative language models, such as ChatGPT (OpenAI, 2022), have brought about various benefits by generating fluent human-like text, the task of distinguishing between human- and large language model (LLM) generated text has emerged as a crucial problem. These models can potentially deceive by generating artificial text that appears to be human-generated. This issue is particularly significant in domains such as law, education, and science, where ensuring the integrity of text is of the utmost importance. This survey provides an overview of the current approaches employed to differentiate between texts generated by humans and ChatGPT. We present an account of the different datasets constructed for detecting ChatGPT-generated text, the various methods utilized, what qualitative analyses into the characteristics of human versus ChatGPT-generated text have been performed, and finally, summarize our findings into general insights

Cited by

Related