2025/05/29 by Luca Pedruzzi, Veronica Maglieri, Paolo Oliveri +5 · 1 voice · 3 citations
Agricultural and Biological Sciences · Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology · Psychology · #Animal Behavior and Reproduction #Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior #Biology #Developmental psychology #Ecology #Evolutionary biology #Primate #Primate Behavior and Ecology #Psychology #Social grooming #Trait #Zoology
paper · pdf · doi:10.1002/ajp.70049
published in American Journal of Primatology 87(6), e70049 (Wiley)
openalex publication_date 2025/05/29 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/22
ABSTRACT Complex communication systems appear to evolve alongside social complexity. Comparing closely related species with similar social structures but distinct sociobiology offers valuable insights into the evolution of communicative variability. Here, we explore yawning (morphology, sensory modalities, contexts, contagious effect), a highly conserved behavioral trait, in two zoo‐housed groups of geladas ( Theropithecus gelada , n subjects = 67, n yawns = 1422) and hamadryas baboons ( Papio hamadryas , n subjects = 28, n yawns = 602). The species are optimal candidates as they both form multilevel groups but differ in intra‐group dynamics, cohesion, and cross‐sex bonding. Although both species displayed distinct yawn morphologies, hamadryas yawned less frequently than geladas, mainly in non‐social contexts and without vocalization. In contrast, geladas yawned more often during affiliative interactions, highlighting a more social dimension to their yawns. When focusing on silent yawns, hamadryas showed a male‐biased yawning frequency, whereas geladas exhibited similar rates between sexes, suggesting a more prominent female role in their yawning patterns. We found that yawning is contagious not only in geladas, as previously known, but also in hamadryas baboons. However, geladas were more responsive to others' yawns, possibly due to their greater communicative complexity or to the need to maintain cohesion in larger groups. In geladas, both sexes exhibited similar levels of yawn contagion, whereas in hamadryas it was predominantly male‐driven, reflecting the central role of males in hamadryas social dynamics. Our study suggests both evolutionary inertia and divergence in Papionine yawning evolution. The findings confirm the derived nature of gelada yawn vocalizations and highlight the link between multimodal communication and social complexity. Moreover, geladas exhibit more nuanced, context‐dependent yawning, likely shaped by their intricate sociobiology. In contrast, hamadryas display a more male‐dominated yawning pattern, reflecting their distinct social dynamics. To fully understand the ecological significance of this ancient behavior, further cross‐species research on yawning and its contagious effect in wild populations is essential.