2025/02/13 by Vicente García‐Navas, Alba Martín del Campo, Marta Rodríguez‐Rey +1 · 1 voice · 1 citation
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology · Agricultural and Biological Sciences · Environmental Science · #Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior #Plant and animal studies #Species Distribution and Climate Change
paper · doi:10.1093/evolut/qpaf027
Theory predicts that selection against maladaptive hybridization leads to divergence of sexual characters in co-occurring closely related species. Consequently, signal disparity should be greater between sympatric vs. allopatric lineage pairs. However, this pattern may also result from species sorting or the greater evolutionary age of sympatric pairs. We used species pairs comparisons to examine the existence of acoustic divergence in a Neotropical montane radiation, the Rhinocryptidae, whose members tend to occupy different elevational ranges. Most rhinocryptids exhibit conservative morphology and are only differentiated by song attributes. Our results show that sympatric species pairs that overlap in elevation exhibited overall greater song divergence compared to allopatric species pairs after controlling for morphological differences, age and phylogenetic effects. Song divergence decreased when excluding sympatric pairs that do not overlap in elevation, suggesting that selection for improved species identification between co-occurring (syntopic) species accentuates signal differentiation. Comparative evolutionary models of signal differentiation over time revealed a similar pattern, which suggests that sexual selection in syntopy might have driven reproductive character displacement in this radiation. We conclude that selection against the production of unfit hybrids could favor acoustic traits that reliably signal species identity in tropical environments where many taxa are poorly differentiated by visual attributes.