2021/09/14 by Soojin Park, Park, Soojin, Suyeon Kang +3 · 2 citations
Mathematics · Social Sciences · #Advanced Causal Inference Techniques #Applications (stat.AP) #FOS: Computer and information sciences #Health disparities and outcomes #Methodology (stat.ME) #Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2109.06940
openalex publication_date 2021/09/14 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28
Causal decomposition analysis provides a way to identify mediators that contribute to health disparities between marginalized and non-marginalized groups. In particular, the degree to which a disparity would be reduced or remain after intervening on a mediator is of interest. Yet, estimating disparity reduction and remaining might be challenging for many researchers, possibly because there is a lack of understanding of how each estimation method differs from other methods. In addition, there is no appropriate estimation method available for a certain setting (i.e., a regression-based approach with a categorical mediator). Therefore, we review the merits and limitations of the existing three estimation methods (i.e., regression, weighting, and imputation) and provide two new extensions that are useful in practical settings. A flexible new method uses an extended imputation approach to address a categorical and continuous mediator or outcome while incorporating any nonlinear relationships. A new regression method provides a simple estimator that performs well in terms of bias and variance but at the cost of assuming linearity, except for exposure and mediator interactions. Recommendations are given for choosing methods based on a review of different methods and simulation studies. We demonstrate the practice of choosing an optimal method by identifying mediators that reduce race and gender disparity in cardiovascular health, using data from the Midlife Development in the US study.