2019/09/17 by Yoonkyung Lee
Health Professions · Social Sciences · #Asian Industrial and Economic Development #Employment and Welfare Studies #Labor Movements and Unions
paper · doi:10.1080/00472336.2019.1663552
openalex publication_date 2019/09/17 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/23
This article begins by asking what lies behind the rise of extreme methods of labour repression in Korea in the 2000s. The answer goes beyond the common neo-liberal conditions of intensified competition, insecurity and precariousness in the labour market. This study focuses on how market logic, emboldened by neo-liberal restructuring, guides the state and corporations to reconfigure methods of disempowering organised labour. The examination of Korea shows the government and employers have actively used newly emergent commercial security firms and public labour attorney offices to exercise private violence and file damage compensation lawsuits against unions and workers who resist neo-liberal employment conditions. The systematic deployment of commercial violence and dispossessive litigation to constrain workers’ mobilisation deepens our understanding of the complexity of state and corporate coercion in the neo-liberal era. The state–capital relation in these circumstances also raises questions about the authority of legal institutions under democratic governments encroached by heightened power of corporate interests.