vix.ing · top · new · best · stats

Strengths and Weaknesses of Quantum Computing

1997/01/01 by Charles H. Bennett, Ethan Bernstein, Gilles Brassard +1 · 1,498 citations
Computer Science · Mathematics · Physics and Astronomy · #Algorithm #Combinatorics #Complexity class #Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms #Computation #Computer science #Discrete mathematics #Mathematics #Oracle #Physics #Quantum #Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture #Quantum Information and Cryptography #Quantum Turing machine #Quantum algorithm #Quantum complexity theory #Quantum computer #Quantum error correction #Quantum mechanics #Quantum sort #Time complexity #Time hierarchy theorem #Turing machine #Universal Turing machine #quant-ph

paper · pdf · doi:10.1137/s0097539796300933

published in SIAM Journal on Computing 26(5), 1510-1523 (Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics) · 18 pages, latex, no figures, to appear in SIAM Journal on Computing (special issue on quantum computing)

arxiv created 1997/01/01 · openalex publication_date 1997/10/01 · arxiv updated 2020/03/26 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/05

Abstract

Recently a great deal of attention has been focused on quantum computation following a sequence of results [Bernstein and Vazirani, in Proc. 25th Annual ACM Symposium Theory Comput., 1993, pp. 11--20, SIAM J. Comput., 26 (1997), pp. 1277--1339], [Simon, in Proc. 35th Annual IEEE Symposium Foundations Comput. Sci., 1994, pp. 116--123, SIAM J. Comput., 26 (1997), pp. 1340--1349], [Shor, in Proc. 35th Annual IEEE Symposium Foundations Comput. Sci., 1994, pp. 124--134] suggesting that quantum computers are more powerful than classical probabilistic computers. Following Shor's result that factoring and the extraction of discrete logarithms are both solvable in quantum polynomial time, it is natural to ask whether all of \NP can be efficiently solved in quantum polynomial time. In this paper, we address this question by proving that relative to an oracle chosen uniformly at random with probability 1 the class \NP cannot be solved on a quantum Turing machine (QTM) in time o(2n/2). We also show that relative to a permutation oracle chosen uniformly at random with probability 1 the class \NP ∩ \coNP cannot be solved on a QTM in time o(2n/3). The former bound is tight since recent work of Grover [in \it Proc. 28th Annual ACM Symposium Theory Comput., 1996] shows how to accept the class \NP relative to any oracle on a quantum computer in time O(2n/2).

Citations

Cited by

Related