1989/08/01 by Randall L. Calvert, Mathew D. McCubbins, Barry R. Weingast · 76 citations
Business, Management and Accounting · Social Sciences · #Agency (philosophy) #Business #Control (management) #Corporate governance #Discretion #Economics #Law #Law and economics #Management #Political Influence and Corporate Strategies #Political science #Politics #Principal–agent problem #Public Policy and Administration Research #Social science #Sociology
paper · open access · doi:10.2307/2111064
published in American Journal of Political Science 33(3), 588 (Wiley)
openalex publication_date 1989/08/01 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/01
A major issue in the study of American politics is the extent to which electoral discipline also constrains bureaucrats. In practice, executive agencies operate with considerable independence from elected officials. However,the entire process of policy execution is a game among legislators.the chief executive. and bureaucratic agents. It includes the initial delegation of authority, the choice of policy alternatives,and opportunities for oversight and control. A simple model of this process demonstrates an important distinction between bureaucratic authority and bureaucratic discretion. Indeed.in its simplest form, the model predicts a world in which bureaucrats are the sole active participants in policymaking, but in which the choice of policy is traceable entirely to the preferences of elected officials. More realistically. the model leads to a precise definition of agency discretion. These conclusions have practical applications for both students and reformers of policymaking.