Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs

2006/06/21 by Charles S. Taber, Milton Lodge · 160 citations
Social Sciences · #Electoral Systems and Political Participation #Social and Intergroup Psychology #Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies

paper · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00214.x

Abstract

We propose a model of motivated skepticism that helps explain when and why citizens are biased‐information processors. Two experimental studies explore how citizens evaluate arguments about affirmative action and gun control, finding strong evidence of a prior attitude effect such that attitudinally congruent arguments are evaluated as stronger than attitudinally incongruent arguments. When reading pro and con arguments, participants (Ps) counterargue the contrary arguments and uncritically accept supporting arguments, evidence of a disconfirmation bias. We also find a confirmation bias—the seeking out of confirmatory evidence—when Ps are free to self‐select the source of the arguments they read. Both the confirmation and disconfirmation biases lead to attitude polarization—the strengthening of t 2 over t 1 attitudes—especially among those with the strongest priors and highest levels of political sophistication. We conclude with a discussion of the normative implications of these findings for rational behavior in a democracy.

Citations

• The Role of Social Groups in Political Thinking
• The case for motivated reasoning.

Cited by

• No Need to Watch: How the Effects of Partisan Media Can Spread via Interpersonal Discussions
• When Common Identities Decrease Trust: An Experimental Study of Partisan Women
• Cueing Without Parties: Experimental Evidence from Peru
• Checking the Fact-Checkers: The Role of Source Type, Perceived Credibility, and Individual Differences in Fact-Checking Effectiveness
• A Meta-Analytic Examination of the Continued Influence of Misinformation in the Face of Correction: How Powerful Is It, Why Does It Happen, and How to Stop It?
• Selective Exposure in the Age of Social Media
• Boomerang Effects in Science Communication
• Confirmation Bias, Ingroup Bias, and Negativity Bias in Selective Exposure to Political Information
• How to Improve Attitudes Toward Disliked Groups
• Climate on Cable
• “It’s Not That Simple, We Don’t Know the Whole Truth”: The Effects of Pseudo Fact Checking in Wartime Russia
• The effects of government propaganda in electoral authoritarian regimes: Evidence from Turkey
• Politically Knowledgeable or Directional (Mis)Believers? How to Identify Those Who Are correct About Political Facts for the “Wrong” Reasons
• Beyond innumeracy: measuring public misperceptions about immigration
• Countering Misinformation Early: Evidence from a Classroom-Based Field Experiment in India
• Campaigns do matter: The impact of campaigns in reducing framing effects
• Political violence in democracies: An Introduction
• Does Media Framing of Election Results Affect Whether Voters Perceive Parties as Election Winners or Losers?
• The Gendered Risks of Violating Expectations and the Importance of Information for Women Candidates
• Factual knowledge can reduce attitude polarization
• Attitudes toward artificial intelligence (AI) and globalization: Common microfoundations and political implications
• Trump, Twitter, and truth judgments: The effects of “disputed” tags and political knowledge on the judged truthfulness of election misinformation
• The State and the Refugee. Governing Asylum at the Intersection Between Politics and Administration
• Putting Terror in Its Place: An Experiment on Mitigating Fears of Terrorism among the American Public
• Reality Bites: Partisan Beliefs as Enforced Norms
• Misinformation, Narratives, and Intergroup Attitudes: Evidence from India
• Network Agenda Setting, or Networked Framing? (Non)correspondence Between User and Right-Wing Media Semantic Networks on YouTube
• Does Hard Propaganda (Also) Work in Democracies? Evidence from the United States
• Public Opinion Negotiations in a Digital Media Ecosystem: A Conceptual Framework
• Why do people like technocrats?
• Misinformation or Expressive Responding?
• Perceived Political Bias in LLMs Reduces Persuasive Abilities
• Growth models and voter preferences: the moderating impact of export-led growth on centre-left voters
• The Partisan Foundations of Attitudes Towards State Supreme Courts
• Toward Parsimony in Bias Research: A Proposed Common Framework of Belief-Consistent Information Processing for a Set of Biases
• The simulation of judgment in LLMs
• How do social media users and journalists express concerns about social media misinformation? A computational analysis
• Belief Network Analysis: A Relational Approach to Understanding the Structure of Attitudes
• How to Distinguish Motivated Reasoning from Bayesian Updating
• Does Procedural Fairness Impact Public Perception of Judicial Opinions? Evidence from a Survey Experiment
• Back up or Backfire? The Impact of Human Rights Sanctions on Target Citizens’ Attitudes Toward Human Rights and Mobilizations
• A cognitive resource-rational account of epistemic injustice
• Is the public legitimacy of protests rooted in the political context? An experimental study comparing protests by environmentalists and farmers
• Career Civil Servants’ Socially Embedded Responses to Democratic Backsliding
• What makes online political ads unacceptable? Interrogating public attitudes to inform regulatory responses
• When Corrections Fail: The Persistence of Political Misperceptions
• The Elusive Backfire Effect: Mass Attitudes’ Steadfast Factual Adherence
• Does Politics Influence Hiring? Evidence from a Randomized Experiment
• In the Eye of the Beholder? Motivated Reasoning in Disputed Elections
• The Influence of Partisan Motivated Reasoning on Public Opinion
• Do voters polarise in response to elite dissensus on immigration?
• How algorithmically curated online environments influence users’ political polarization: Results from two experiments with panel data
• Decision-Making Mistakes in Asylum Policy: A Comparative Study of Public Opinion
• Can Confirmation Bias Improve Group Learning?
• Do discussions in like-minded groups necessarily lead to more extreme opinions? Deliberative democracy and group polarization
• Development and Validation of the Scientific Reasoning Scale
• Cross-partisan discussions reduced political polarization between UK voters, but less so when they disagreed
• Political Self-Confidence and Affective Polarization
• Cure or curse? The role of deliberation in shaping willful ignorance
• Toward a General Framework of Biased Reasoning: Coherence-Based Reasoning
• The influence of information format and framing on acceptance of energy storage technologies
• Citizens’ Acceptance of Data-Driven Political Campaigning: A 25-Country Cross-National Vignette Study
• Does news literacy help combat misinformation? The interplay of news literacy, political ideology, and ideological media use on COVID-19 misperceptions
• The Honest Broker versus the Epistocrat: Attenuating Distrust in Science by Disentangling Science from Politics
• Media effects revisited: corporate scandals, partisan narratives, and attitudes toward cryptocurrency regulation
• Do people better recognize inconsistencies in others’ moral judgments than their own? If so, why?
• New Perspectives on Trust in International Conflicts
• Losing Out: How the Public Assesses Coverage Loss due to Administrative Burden
• Misinformation and Motivated Reasoning: Responses to Economic News in a Politicized Environment
• The lure of rationality: Why does the deficit model persist in science communication?
• Beyond Belief Change: The Persuasive Returns of Targeting Attitude–Relevant Beliefs
• Beliefs about Climate Beliefs: The Importance of Second-Order Opinions for Climate Politics
• The New Personal Influence: How Our Facebook Friends Influence the News We Read
• Believing and Sharing Information by Fake Sources: An Experiment
• Performance information and issue prioritization by political and managerial decision-makers: A discrete choice experiment
• Symbolic Racism and Emotional Responses to the 2012 Presidential Candidates
• Filter Bubbles, Echo Chambers, and Fake News: How Social Media Conditions Individuals to Be Less Critical of Political Misinformation
• Contingent Confidence: The Effect of the 2024 Election Outcome on Public and Elite Confidence in National Elections
• Correcting Misperceptions Across Contexts: The Political Impact of Gender Inequality Information in Japan and South Korea
• Unraveling Americans’ Selective Sympathies Toward Israelis and Palestinians
• Affective polarisation and the sorting of policy preferences in multiparty systems
• “That’s just, like, your opinion” – European citizens’ ability to distinguish factual information from opinion
• Searching for the backfire effect: Measurement and design considerations.
• Belief in Hydroxychloroquine During the <scp>COVID</scp> ‐19 Pandemic: More Than Motivated Reasoning?
• A review of the effects of uncertainty in public science communication
• THE POLITICS OF MOTIVATION
• Deliberation and Opinion Change: Evidence from a Deliberative Mini‐public in<scp>F</scp>inland
• The limits of sportswashing. How the 2022 FIFA World Cup affected attitudes about Qatar
• The Nature and Origins of Misperceptions: Understanding False and Unsupported Beliefs About Politics
• Do international rankings affect public opinion?
• Individual ideology and biased perceptions of relative income position
• Can fictional stories beat the congeniality bias? Selective exposure to fiction and non-fiction
• Do cross-cutting discussions enhance pro-environmental attitudes? Testing green deliberative theory in practice
• Jesus was a Refugee: Religious Values Framing can Increase Support for Refugees Among White Evangelical Republicans
• The “Clinching Effect” and Affective Polarization: Exposure to Incivility via Social Media in the Presence of Online News
• How the Pro-Beijing Media Influences Voters: Evidence from a Randomized Field Experiment
• From political to democratic sophistication—A critical reappraisal
• Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization
• Echo chamber and trench warfare dynamics in online debates
• How Europeans compare Putin and Stalin in the context of Russia's war in Ukraine
• The impact of situational context and dispositions on costly signals of reassurance: Experimental evidence from Taiwan
• Have your cake and eat it, too? Switzerland and the feasibility of differentiated integration after Brexit
• Misperceptions about Immigration: Reviewing Their Nature, Motivations and Determinants
• Do Justices Defend the Speech They Hate?
• When Do Broken Campaign Promises Matter? Evidence From Four Experiments
• Partisans process policy-based and identity-based messages using dissociable neural systems
• Foreign Agents? Public Attitudes Toward Nongovernmental Organizations in a Backsliding Democracy
• Challenging by Cueing? An Investigation of Party and Leader Cueing Effects Across Mainstream and Challenger Party Voters
• The Nonconsequences of COVID-19 on Left–Right Ideological Beliefs
• Personal Values and Cognitive Biases
• Are competent citizens critical democrats? Political resources and evaluations of democratic institutions
• Debunking Three Myths About Misinformation
• Extreme weather and climate change attitudes: Limited partisan motivated reasoning in response to Sweden's 2018 heatwave
• Voter Information Search and Ranked Choice Voting
• Electoral Manipulation and Regime Support
• Is Partisan Selective Exposure an American Peculiarity? A Comparative Study of News Browsing Behaviors in the United States, Japan, and Hong Kong
• Do Voters Polarize When Radical Parties Enter Parliament?
• A preregistered replication of motivated numeracy
• From Attention to Dialogue: Does Audience Engagement Reinforce Constructive Cross-Party Communication?
• Co-evolution of groups and opinions in an agent-based model
• Misinformation, observational equivalence and the possibility of rationality
• Mind the (Collaborative) Gap: How the Public Symbolically Rewards and Punishes Policy Actors for Their Collaborative Choices
• Performance Information, Racial Bias, and Citizen Evaluations of Government: Evidence from Two Studies
• Bayes or Pascal? The computations underlying motivated reasoning
• Memeing Politics: Understanding Political Meme Creators, Audiences, and Consequences on Social Media
• Beyond NIMBY-ism: rethinking acceptance of housing densification in a direct democratic renters society
• The Drug Crisis and Voting Behavior
• The Moderating Effect of Debates on Political Attitudes
• Online political adverts: The effect of disclosures and opportunities for clandestine campaigning
• How does a focusing event shape public opinion? Natural experimental evidence from the Orlando mass shooting
• Why do politicians perceive the same financial conditions differently?
• The reverberations of British Brexit politics abroad
• Viewed from Different Engels? Differences in Reactions to “Socialism” as a Policy Label
• “My thinking has changed but beliefs have not”: Motivated reasoning in learning to teach abortion
• Empathy and Political Reasoning
• Social Media, Network Heterogeneity, and Opinion Polarization
• Trust in the Count: Improving Voter Confidence with Post-election Audits
• Meinungsfreiheit in Gefahr? Wie politische Einstellungen und individuelle Erfahrungen die Wahrnehmung der Meinungsfreiheit in Deutschland prägen
• Ideology, motivated reasoning, and cognitive reflection
• Tracking Public Beliefs About Anthropogenic Climate Change
• VII—Can Arguments Change Minds?
• Making Sense of AI-Generated Disinformation: How Audience Interpretations Influence the Impact of Deepfakes in Kenya
• Media effects, selection effects, or no effects? A longitudinal analysis of the relationship between media use and misperceptions
• (Mis)information, Polarization, and Trust in Elections: Longitudinal Evidence from Canada
• From News Literacy to Skepticism: Examining the Pathways That Shape the “News-Finds-Me” Perception
• The Responsibility of Intellectuals
• The levers of political persuasion with conversational artificial intelligence
• Public Opinion on Geopolitics and Trade
• Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory
• No, It Is Not All About Selective Exposure: Information Selection Strategies in Referendums
• Policy Narratives and Policy Processes
• The Psychology of Falsehood: A Human-Centric Survey of Misinformation Detection
• A Narrative Policy Framework: Clear Enough to Be Wrong?
• Media Use and Political Predispositions: Revisiting the Concept of Selective Exposure
• Are LLM Agents Behaviorally Coherent? Latent Profiles for Social Simulation
• The Epistemic Value of Democratic Meritocracy
• The public on trial: how the perceived significance of media exposure shapes interest, knowledge and opinion in a murder case
• The cognitive benefits of online microtargeted political ads: explaining attitudes, political interest, and campaign knowledge
• Small Word Change, Large Effect on News Users? How the Use of Gender-Inclusive Language in News Articles Influences News Selection and News Engagement
• The News You Choose: news media preferences amplify views on climate change

Related

• Motivated Reasoning and Public Opinion Perception
• The Fake News Effect: Experimentally Identifying Motivated Reasoning Using Trust in News
• Factual knowledge can reduce attitude polarization
• Political belief bias: the role of analytic thinking and valuing epistemic rationality
• Partisan belief in new misinformation is resistant to accuracy incentives