2014/04/25 by Katharine N. Rankin, Heather McLean · 82 citations
Social Sciences · #Archaeology #Complicity #Disinvestment #Economic growth #Economics #Gender studies #Gentrification #Geography #Law #Media studies #Neighbourhood (mathematics) #Political economy #Political science #Racialization #Sociology #Urban Planning and Governance #Urban and Rural Development Challenges #Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies #Urbanism
paper · doi:10.1111/anti.12096
published in Antipode 47(1), 216-239 (Wiley)
openalex publication_date 2014/04/25 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28
Abstract This paper explores the commercial shopping street as a site of racialized class struggle. The argument builds around the study of a disinvested inner‐suburban neighbourhood in Toronto, which furnishes an ideal case through which to achieve the paper's objectives of, first, identifying commercial space as an important site of contestation over competing suburban futures; second, delineating how processes of racialization inform the economies of commercial gentrification and urban renewal; and third, highlighting the epistemological and theoretical insights that emerge when research is conducted collaboratively, among academic, community, and activist groupings. The paper argues that such commercial spaces play a key role in making the city accessible to vulnerable and marginalized groups. Two competing planning agendas centred on reordering commercial space, meanwhile, spell the almost‐certain demise of such arrangements: a “real estate” vision featuring new condominium developments, and a new urbanist resistance favouring “green” and “creative” alternatives. Our engagements with precarious, predominantly immigrant‐owned businesses and community‐based researchers reveal the complicity of both modes of development planning with processes of displacement and structural racism. Specifying these dynamics as “racialized class projects” opens up space for intervention and organizing.