2019/06/28 by Malini Ranganathan, Eve Bratman, Eve Z. Bratman · 225 citations
Environmental Science · Psychology · Social Sciences · #Climate Change and Health Impacts #Climate change #Climate justice #Criminology #Disaster Management and Resilience #Ecology #Economic Justice #Environmental Justice and Health Disparities #Environmental ethics #Environmental justice #Gender studies #Law #Political science #Psychological resilience #Psychology #Racism #Social psychology #Sociology #Solidarity #Vulnerability (computing)
paper · doi:10.1111/anti.12555
published in Antipode 53(1), 115-137 (Wiley)
openalex publication_date 2019/06/28 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28
Abstract What would abolitionism mean for climate justice? “Resilience” is proposed by experts as a solution to climate change vulnerability. But this prescription tends to focus on adaptation to future external threats, subtly validating embedded processes of racial capitalism that have historically dehumanised and endangered residents and their environments in the first place. This article focuses on majority Black areas said to be vulnerable to extreme weather events and targeted for expert‐driven resilience enhancements in America's capital city, Washington, DC . Drawing on key insights from Black radical, feminist, and antiracist humanist thought, we reimagine resilience through an abolitionist framework. Using archival analysis, oral histories, a neighbourhood‐level survey, and interviews conducted between 2015 and 2018, we argue that abolitionist climate justice entails a centring of DC 's historical environmental and housing‐related racisms, the intersectional drivers of precarity and trauma experienced by residents beyond those narrowly associated with “climate”; and an ethics of care and healing practiced by those deemed most at risk to climate change.