2025/10/03 by Tamarinde Haven, Tamarinde L. Haven, John P. A. Ioannidis +1 · 5 citations
Decision Sciences · #Critical appraisal #MEDLINE #Meta-analysis and systematic reviews #Psychological intervention #Reproducibility #Unintended consequences
paper · doi:10.1146/annurev-med-050124-050859
published in Annual Review of Medicine 77(1), 537-549 (Annual Reviews)
openalex publication_date 2025/10/03 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28
Reproducibility concerns in biomedical research have persisted for more than a decade, with large-scale assessments revealing significant challenges in replicating findings. Despite widespread acknowledgment of these issues, responses remain inconsistent, and proposed solutions often lack rigorous evaluation. This review examines the factors that contribute to irreproducibility in conducting, reporting, and reviewing research and assesses the effectiveness and desirability of interventions aimed at improving reproducibility. It highlights the need for balanced scientific reforms that strengthen reproducibility without stifling innovation or introducing unintended consequences. A critical appraisal of the role of meta-research is essential to ensure sustainable improvements in research quality.