vix.ing · top · new · best · stats

Paths to Polarization: How Extreme Views, Miscommunication, and Random Chance Drive Opinion Dynamics

2018/05/15 by Matthew A. Turner, Paul E. Smaldino, Turner, Matthew A. +1 · 1 citation
Physics and Astronomy · Social Sciences · #Adaptation and Self-Organizing Systems (nlin.AO) #Complex Network Analysis Techniques #FOS: Physical sciences #Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence #Physics and Society (physics.soc-ph) #Social Media and Politics #nlin.AO #physics.soc-ph

paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1805.06057

Expanded references, fixed typos and errors, broadened literature review

openalex publication_date 2018/05/15 · arxiv created 2018/08/02 · arxiv updated 2018/08/03 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28

Abstract

Understanding the social conditions that tend to increase or decrease polarization is important for many reasons. We study a network-structured agent-based model of opinion dynamics, extending a model previously introduced by Flache and Macy (2011), who found that polarization appeared to increased with the introduction of long-range ties but decrease with the number of salient opinions, which they called the population's "cultural complexity." We find the following. First, polarization is strongly path dependent and sensitive to stochastic variation. Second, polarization depends strongly on the initial distribution of opinions in the population. In the absence of extremists, polarization may be mitigated. Third, noisy communication can drive a population toward more extreme opinions and even cause acute polarization. Finally, the apparent reduction in polarization under increased "cultural complexity" arises via a particular property of the polarization measurement, under which a population containing a wider diversity of extreme views is deemed less polarized. This work has implications for understanding the population dynamics of beliefs, opinions, and polarization, as well as broader implications for the analysis of agent-based models of social phenomena.

Cited by

Related