2021/04/12 by Marcus Kaiser, Kaiser, Marcus, Maksim Sipos +1 · 2 citations
Computer Science · Decision Sciences · #Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference #Data Quality and Management #FOS: Computer and information sciences #FOS: Mathematics #Machine Learning (cs.LG) #Machine Learning (stat.ML) #Rough Sets and Fuzzy Logic #Statistics Theory (math.ST)
paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2104.05441
openalex publication_date 2021/04/12 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28
Causal Discovery methods aim to identify a DAG structure that represents causal relationships from observational data. In this article, we stress that it is important to test such methods for robustness in practical settings. As our main example, we analyze the NOTEARS method, for which we demonstrate a lack of scale-invariance. We show that NOTEARS is a method that aims to identify a parsimonious DAG from the data that explains the residual variance. We conclude that NOTEARS is not suitable for identifying truly causal relationships from the data.