2020/01/10 by Amanda Conlin, Amanda L. Conlin, Xinyu Hu +2 · 18 citations
Business, Management and Accounting · Health Professions · Neuroscience · Psychology · #Affect (linguistics) #Applied psychology #Cognitive psychology #Computer science #Incentive #Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior #Management #Mind wandering and attention #Perspective (graphical) #Psychology #Relaxation (psychology) #Social psychology #Task (project management) #Work (physics) #Workplace Health and Well-being
paper · doi:10.1177/0033294119900347
published in Psychological Reports 124(1), 248-265 (SAGE Publishing)
openalex publication_date 2020/01/10 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/01
Recovery from work is generally thought to occur outside of the workplace. However, employees may also have the opportunity to recover within the work day via microbreaks during demanding work tasks. Two major strategies for mitigating fatigue include psychological detachment (i.e., mentally disengaging) and replenishing motivational incentives via positive affect. This study examined whether 40-s “microbreaks” improve work recovery and to what extent different microbreak content (mastery vs. relaxation activities) boost performance. Using an experimental study, we randomly assigned individuals to receive a relaxation microbreak ( n = 59), a mastery microbreak ( n = 68), or no break ( n = 72) in the middle of a monotonous work task and assessed work performance. Microbreaks improved task performance and within-task recovery, but only for psychological detachment (not positive affect). Mastery breaks also resulted in more psychological detachment than relaxation breaks, but this increased detachment did not explain performance differences between break types. These results build on existing recovery theories by further demonstrating within-task recovery and provide practical implications for organizations to consider the importance of microbreaks.