2021/06/14 by Theron Pummer · 47 citations
Arts and Humanities · Neuroscience · #Deontic logic #Economics #Epistemology #Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics #Free Will and Agency #Law and economics #Philosophy #Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
paper · doi:10.1086/713953
published in Ethics 131(4), 697-726 (University of Chicago Press)
openalex publication_date 2021/06/14 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28
It is commonly held that unexcused impermissible acts are necessarily blameworthy, not praiseworthy. I argue that unexcused impermissible acts can be not only pro tanto praiseworthy but also overall praiseworthy—and even more so than permissible alternatives. For example, there are cases in which it is impermissible to, at great cost to yourself, rescue fewer rather than more strangers, yet overall praiseworthy, and more so than permissibly rescuing no one. I develop a general framework illuminating how praiseworthiness can so radically come apart from deontic status.