2024/12/06 by Daniel Carney, Akira Matsumura, Carney, Daniel +1 · 3 voices · 1 citation
Physics and Astronomy · #Quantum optics and atomic interactions
paper · pdf · doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ade589
Abstract We analyze the framework recently proposed by Oppenheim et al (2023 Nat. Commun. 14 ; 2023 Phys. Rev. X 13 041040; arXiv:2302.07283 [gr-qc]; 2023 J. High Energy Phys. JHEP08(2023)163) to model relativistic quantum fields coupled to relativistic, classical, stochastic fields (in particular, as a model of quantum matter coupled to ‘classical gravity’). Perhaps surprisingly, we find that we can define and calculate scattering probabilities which are Lorentz-covariant and conserve total probability, at least at tree level. As a concrete example, we analyze <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> <mml:mo accent="false" stretchy="false">→</mml:mo> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> scattering of quantum matter mediated by a classical Yukawa field. Mapping this to a gravitational coupling in the non-relativistic limit, and assuming that we can treat large objects as point masses, we find that the simplest possible ‘classical-quantum’ gravity theory constructed this way gives predictions for <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> <mml:mo accent="false" stretchy="false">→</mml:mo> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> gravitational scattering which are inconsistent with simple observations of, e.g. spacecraft undergoing slingshot maneuvers. We comment on lessons learned for attempts to couple quantum matter to ‘non-quantum’ gravity, or more generally, for attempts to couple relativistic quantum and classical systems.