2022/01/13 by Sylvie Honigman
Arts and Humanities · Social Sciences · #Aesthetics #Art #Biblical Studies and Interpretation #Classics #Competition (biology) #Face (sociological concept) #Greeks #Historical and Linguistic Studies #Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies #History #Identity (music) #Jewish studies #Judaism #Literature #Philosophy #Religious studies #Social science #Sociology #Theology
paper · doi:10.1163/15700631-bja10044
openalex publication_date 2022/01/13 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/23
Abstract The article examines afresh statements defining the divine persona of the god of the Judeans in Let. Aris. 9–34 and 128–171. They are interpreted not simply as instances of positive competition with Greek literature and philosophy, but as the product of a triangulated cultural dynamic that also included Egyptian and Greco-Egyptian religious tenets about major Egyptian deities, first and foremost Isis. The said passages in Aristeas are compared with Isidorus’ hymns to Isis Nermouthis in Narmouthis, the archives of Ḥor, and the Isis aretalogies. It is claimed that Aristeas illustrates how Alexandrian Judean authors competed with Egyptian priests and Greco-Egyptian authors in their respective pursuit of cultural acknowledgment by the socially and culturally dominant group, namely the Greeks. Aristeas replicates the Ptolemies’ “double-faced” dynastic identity, but aims to replace the Egyptian half of this double face with a Judean one.