2022/12/08 by Esther Barbé, Diego Badell · 14 citations
Social Sciences · #Gender Politics and Representation #Human rights #Human sexuality #International Human Rights and Reproductive Law #Law #Norm (philosophy) #Normative #Political science #Population #Reproductive health #Reproductive rights #Sexual and reproductive health and rights #Sociology
paper · doi:10.1177/00471178221136994
published in International Relations 37(2), 274-297 (SAGE Publishing)
openalex publication_date 2022/12/08 · openalex created_date 2023/01/03 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/30
This article studies Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights (SRHR) at the United Nations (UN). SRHR, a gender equality norm that applies human rights to sexuality and reproduction, have traditionally been supported by a network of actors led by the United States (US) and the European Union. Nevertheless, a rival network has contested SRHR since their conception in the early 1990s. We study the robustness of SRHR in five UN fora between 2009 and 2020, focusing on actor constellations, productive power and norm concordance. Between 2009 and 2016, the normative status quo was maintained, except in the Human Rights Council and the Security Council. In 2017, the US joined the network of rivals and accelerated the norm’s weakening in the Security Council and the Commission on Population and Development. However, to weaken or strengthen the norm further, both networks see a need to address SRHR outside the UN.